what was the major reason hindering us to support both Spark 1.x and 2.x at
the same time?
Regards,
Matthias
From: dusenberr...@gmail.com
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 08/17/2016 07:26 PM
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0
Yes, I think
016 02:41:51 PM---Hi Glenn, I am fine with this
> approach. If this approach is taken, I would like to
>
> From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 08/16/2016 02:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0
>
>
&g
om same
>
> From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 08/08/2016 03:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0
> --
>
>
>
> As a preliminary experiment in attempt to compile against both Spark 2.0
US
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org');>
> Date: 08/03/2016 05:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0
> --
>
>
>
> I am in favor of having one more
dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 08/03/2016 03:58 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0
While I agree that getting onto Spark 2.0 quickly ought to be a priority,
there are existing early users of SystemML who are likely stuck on Spark
1.6.x for the next few months. Those users co
At us.ibm.com
http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar
From: Frederick R Reiss/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 08/03/2016 03:58 PM
Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0
While I agree that getting onto Spark 2.0
I would definitely be in favor of moving to Spark 2.0 as early as possible.
This will allow SystemML to be current with cutting edge Spark. It would be
nice to focus our efforts on the latest Spark.
Deron
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:05 PM, wrote:
> I'm in favor of moving