Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0

2016-08-24 Thread Matthias Boehm
what was the major reason hindering us to support both Spark 1.x and 2.x at the same time? Regards, Matthias From: dusenberr...@gmail.com To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 08/17/2016 07:26 PM Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0 Yes, I think

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0

2016-08-17 Thread dusenberrymw
016 02:41:51 PM---Hi Glenn, I am fine with this > approach. If this approach is taken, I would like to > > From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 08/16/2016 02:41 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0 > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0

2016-08-16 Thread Deron Eriksson
om same > > From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 08/08/2016 03:33 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0 > -- > > > > As a preliminary experiment in attempt to compile against both Spark 2.0

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0

2016-08-04 Thread Luciano Resende
US > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org');> > Date: 08/03/2016 05:15 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0 > -- > > > > I am in favor of having one more

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0

2016-08-04 Thread Matthias Boehm
dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 08/03/2016 03:58 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0 While I agree that getting onto Spark 2.0 quickly ought to be a priority, there are existing early users of SystemML who are likely stuck on Spark 1.6.x for the next few months. Those users co

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0

2016-08-03 Thread Niketan Pansare
At us.ibm.com http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar From: Frederick R Reiss/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 08/03/2016 03:58 PM Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0 While I agree that getting onto Spark 2.0

Re: [DISCUSS] Migration to Spark 2.0.0

2016-08-02 Thread Deron Eriksson
I would definitely be in favor of moving to Spark 2.0 as early as possible. This will allow SystemML to be current with cutting edge Spark. It would be nice to focus our efforts on the latest Spark. Deron On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:05 PM, wrote: > I'm in favor of moving