Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

2017-05-01 Thread Niketan Pansare
/view.php?person=us-npansar From: Deron Eriksson To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 05/01/2017 02:40 PM Subject:Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests Would anyone else in our SystemML community care to comment? So far we have a tie: 3 for option 2

Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

2017-05-01 Thread Deron Eriksson
> > > > Arvind Surve ---04/28/2017 11:09:48 AM---Agree, these messages are > distractions. Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark. > > > > From: Arvind Surve > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" apache.org> > > Date: 04

Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

2017-04-28 Thread dusenberrymw
e ---04/28/2017 11:09:48 AM---Agree, these messages are > distractions. Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark. > > From: Arvind Surve > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" > Date: 04/28/2017 11:09 AM > Subject: Re: Build passed/failed message

Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

2017-04-28 Thread Glenn Weidner
My preference is option 3. Thanks, Glenn From: Arvind Surve To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" Date: 04/28/2017 11:09 AM Subject: Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests Agree, these messages are distractions.  Arvind Surve | Spark

Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

2017-04-28 Thread Arvind Surve
Agree, these messages are distractions.  Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center  | http://www.spark.tc/ From: Matthias Boehm To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 11:05 AM Subject: Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests as I commented on one

Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

2017-04-28 Thread Matthias Boehm
as I commented on one of these github comments, I'm strongly against these kind of unnecessary messages because they distract from the actual discussions. I already had to change my notification settings accordingly - essentially I'm not watching SystemML's PR activity any more. Regards, Matt

Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

2017-04-28 Thread Nakul Jindal
I like option (2) as well. It is difficult for a new contributor to know the URL for the Jenkins server. In so far as this may be considered spam, I would suggest that this can be controlled using the notification settings on github and filters on your email server/client. On Fri, Apr 28, 2017

Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

2017-04-28 Thread Deron Eriksson
Hi, When a pull request is created or another commit is pushed to that pull request, a build including running our test suite is performed (Jenkins at https://sparktc.ibmcloud.com/jenkins/job/SystemML-PullRequestBuilder/). This is the same model that other projects such as Apache Spark use (Jenkin