com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: Release cadence
i am fine with 1.0 but let us stage it in a way that back porting of
possible bug fixes will not be too difficult in the next few weeks or
small nbr of month.
Regards,
Be
: Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 03/12/2017 05:15 PM
Subject: Re: Release cadence
ok great - as the majority is in favor of a 1.0 release and there is no
veto, I think we came to an agreement here: our next release will be
System
good target for
> this
> >>> 1.0 release.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Matthias
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Arvind Surve <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> >>>
th 2 months
>>>> release cycles.We will do first RC build by end of first week of second
>>>> month.
>>>> We will plan on releasing next release by end of April 2017.We will
>> have
>>>> RC build on ~April 6th. -Arvind
>>>> Arvind
n releasing next release by end of April 2017.We will
> have
> > > RC build on ~April 6th. -Arvind
> > > Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark.tc/
> > >
> > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > To: &quo
months.
---
Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center | http://www.spark.tc/
From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2017 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: Release cadence
Personally
quot;dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 11:41 AM
> Subject: Re: Release cadence
>
> We need to release SystemML on more frequent basis to get community
> engaged. It will provide us more feedback on func
| http://www.spark.tc/
From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: Release cadence
We need to release SystemML on more frequent basis to
will be considered.
Meantime we need to start automating testing pieces.
Arvind SurveSpark Technology Centerhttp://www.spark.tc/
From: Berthold Reinwald <reinw...@us.ibm.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 1:35 AM
Subject: Re: Release cadence
I think th
d with each release for end-to-end
> >> performance tests, tests on different environments, code freeze for new
> >> features, etc. Hence, a too short release cycle would not be "agile" but
> >> would actually slow us down. From my perspective, a realistic relea
for end-to-end
> performance tests, tests on different environments, code freeze for new
> features, etc. Hence, a too short release cycle would not be "agile" but
> would actually slow us down. From my perspective, a realistic release
> cadence would be 2-3 months, maybe a bit mo
11 matches
Mail list logo
