nt: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
For some reason, I got an impression that artifacts reduction was completed
earlier, but apparently its not.We are trying to reduce number of artifacts to
avoid confusion to users.This is an issue from ea
address it immediately after SystemML 0.11 goes out. We should not mark
this as a blocking issue for SystemML 0.11.
-Arvind
From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubati
not be "Blocking" for
SystemML 0.11 release.
-ArvindĀ
From: "dusenberr...@gmail.com" <dusenberr...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
There are also two bugs relat
stemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip
>> be removed since there already is a src artifa
>>
>> From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
>> Date: 10/29/2016 09:52 PM
>> Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feed
here already is a src artifa
>
> From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/29/2016 09:52 PM
> Subject: Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
> --
>
>
>
> Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubat
: 10/29/2016 09:52 PM
Subject:Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since
there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip?
Thanks,
Glenn
Luciano Resende ---10/29/2016 07:25:40 PM---Please see IPMC
ubject: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback
Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4:
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html
Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC
vote asap.
Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been add
Please see IPMC feedback on our RC4:
https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html
Please help address these issues, as we are going to have to start a new RC
vote asap.
Also, I am pretty sure some of these issues have been addressed in the
past, so we need to figure