absolutely - based on your comment yesterday, I've created SYSTEMML-1444 as
a placeholder.
Regards,
Matthias
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:23 PM, wrote:
> Great, we should definitely add this to the 1.0 release in order to allow
> for more expressivity in our DML, and to allow for the cleanup of ex
Great, we should definitely add this to the 1.0 release in order to allow for
more expressivity in our DML, and to allow for the cleanup of existing DML that
has had to code around this, such as the `nn` library.
I will add a JIRA (or search for one) and tag it for 1.0.
--
Mike Dusenberry
Git
Well, this would indeed be a very useful extension - I've actually seen
many use cases, where new users ran into issues with simple expressions
like X[i,i] = foo(). In the general case, the problem with UDFs is that
they can have - in contrast to builtin functions - multiple returns. These
multiple
Currently, it is not possible to use UDFs within an expression. I.e. I'd like
to be able to use something like `out = (-1/2) * util::my_function(x)`. This
would of course extend to more elaborate expressions. Also, note that we *are*
able to use built-in functions within expressions.
I think
