Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Reinhard Sandtner as Tamaya Committer and PPMC member

2015-02-01 Thread Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
congrats and welcome onboard! On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Dear All! > > The Apache Tamaya incubation project is proud to announce that Reinhard > Sandtner has joined us as committer and PPMC member. > > > Welcome Reinhard! > > LieGrue, > strub > -- Otávio Gonçalve

Re: Testing Tamaya with custom classpath

2015-02-01 Thread Oliver B. Fischer
Hi, it seems so that the Arquillian daemon is exactly doing what we need: https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-daemon Bye, Oliver Am 29.01.15 um 08:31 schrieb Mark Struberg: That's why I wanted some 'isolating' Arquillian SE adaptor :) I prefer using Arquillian over any homegrown solutio

[jira] [Commented] (TAMAYA-65) Use JBoss ShrinkWrap for integration tests

2015-02-01 Thread Oliver B. Fischer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAMAYA-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14300758#comment-14300758 ] Oliver B. Fischer commented on TAMAYA-65: - It seems not be possible to use ShrinkWr

Re: Testing Tamaya with custom classpath

2015-02-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Just for my knowledge why classloader rule solution is not an option? If we start using remote solutions we ll have other issues (we need random ports at least) and how do you simulate provided libs? + There are alternative like pax and karaf testing integration. All looks complicated for compared

Re: Testing Tamaya with custom classpath

2015-02-01 Thread Mark Struberg
I fear we _will_ need more once containers start to bring their own version of a config system which uses those files. Think about testing Java10 ;) It might not be needed _now_ but as soon as Tamaya makes it into some containers we will probably need it. But maybe I'm already far too advanced

Re: Testing Tamaya with custom classpath

2015-02-01 Thread Mark Struberg
Since we already have 2 impls (Java7 and java8) I'd rather do it now. LieGrue, strub > On Thursday, 29 January 2015, 10:31, Oliver B. Fischer > wrote: > > inline > Am 29.01.15 um 10:19 schrieb Reinhard Sandtner: >> what about a tck-like test-suite to test our java7/java8 core? >> > It is t

Re: Testing Tamaya with custom classpath

2015-02-01 Thread Mark Struberg
That's right, we should be able to run tests in parallel and on Jenkins without blocking other runs. What about Lincolns SE adapter? LieGrue, strub > On Sunday, 1 February 2015, 23:35, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > Just for my knowledge why classloader rule solution is not an option? >

Re: Testing Tamaya with custom classpath

2015-02-01 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Still dont get why we need it Mark and your answers make it worse... Le 2 févr. 2015 07:24, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > That's right, we should be able to run tests in parallel and on Jenkins > without blocking other runs. What about Lincolns SE adapter? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Sund

Java 8

2015-02-01 Thread Tresch, Anatole
Hi all for the ones that did not yet have seen http://www.infoq.com/news/2015/01/java-8-auto-update-java-7-end Seems that Oracle adds one gear for phasing out Java 7 ;) Cheers, Anatole Tresch Platform Strategy & Strategic Projects, KGVX 42 +41 44 334 03 89 (*414 0389)