Re: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

+1 Speak tomorrow in the EG call Am 08.11.2017 05:04 schrieb "Anatole Tresch" : OK, then I will follow up this thing on Thursday with the guys on the EG. Even is we dont get to be the official implementation, our extensions also will allow us to outstand IMO ;-) 2017-11-07

Re: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

OK, then I will follow up this thing on Thursday with the guys on the EG. Even is we dont get to be the official implementation, our extensions also will allow us to outstand IMO ;-) 2017-11-07 23:04 GMT+01:00 Oliver B. Fischer : > Hi Anatole, > > I also think we should

Re: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

Hi Anatole, I also think we should go this way and try to become the RI of the JSR 382. It took me some time but I think it would be worth it. Oliver Am 06.11.17 um 13:27 schrieb Anatole Tresch: Hi all As you all know I am also actively joining the current configuration JSR. Summarizing

RE: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

it must have a RI. Of course having it earlier would be good, Public Draft maybe. Werner From: John D. Ament Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 20:13 To: dev@tamaya.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:09 PM P. Ottlinger

Re: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:09 PM P. Ottlinger wrote: > Am 06.11.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Anatole Tresch: > >- Depending on we would agree to support also the ultimate step, I can > >discuss with the JSR EG that Tamaya might get THE official RI. > >- All our

Re: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

Am 06.11.2017 um 13:27 schrieb Anatole Tresch: >- Depending on we would agree to support also the ultimate step, I can >discuss with the JSR EG that Tamaya might get THE official RI. >- All our extensions and integrations would also work with other >implementations, which would us

Re: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

Found it. Am 06.11.17 um 16:50 schrieb Oliver B. Fischer: Does anyone have a link to the JSR? I didn't find it via Google... Am 06.11.17 um 13:27 schrieb Anatole Tresch: Hi all As you all know I am also actively joining the current configuration JSR. Summarizing the state can be

Re: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

Does anyone have a link to the JSR? I didn't find it via Google... Am 06.11.17 um 13:27 schrieb Anatole Tresch: Hi all As you all know I am also actively joining the current configuration JSR. Summarizing the state can be summarized as follows: - The API as taken over from

Re: [DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

It sounds worth considering. Of course there has been effort by Mark, Co-Spec Lead of the JSR and mostly John into Geronimo Config https://github.com/apache/geronimo-config/graphs/contributors Compared to the codebase and various extension modules (I would not see many as part of the RI, but

[DISCUSS] Offering Tamaya as ConfigJSR reference Impl

Hi all As you all know I am also actively joining the current configuration JSR. Summarizing the state can be summarized as follows: - The API as taken over from microprofile.io will be taken as a starting point. We are discussing a few features that also come with Tamaya, overall I