Howard Lewis Ship gmail.com> writes:
>
> Didn't see any email sent to infrastructure so I sent one now. I
> think I left it unsaid that you should send email to infrastructure
> way back when. I should have been more explicit.
Thanks for the help. As I reported in
http://article.gmane.org/gman
Ok. 4.1 is "out" now. At least in snapshot form. With no
documentation...heh.. So, it's out for the few bleeding edge type people at
least.
I'll be updating documentation more and more indefinitely, saving component
docs until something gets figured out with tapdoc.
On 7/2/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EM
Yeah, you were unlucky in timing, sorry about that. The event stuff (aka
implementing form state management on client side) is in subversion head now
so what you were trying to do would probably work great now.
I have a few unit tests to fix before deploying a new snapshot but will do
it one at s
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 11:38:12 -0400, Norbert Sándor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How compatible are the 4.0 and 4.1 versions?
Can I just replace the 4.0 jars with the 4.1 ones?
I gave 4.1 a whirl and ultimately had to go back to 4.0.2 for the time
being. The form event stuff still needs some
Currently I'm very close to a project deadline, so please don't expect
more progress on TapDoc in the following 1-2 weeks.
After then I will convert all my running Tapestry projects to maven, so
I will need a plugin for it too :)
Regards,
Norbi
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
There are no component docs
Has anyone noticed this new feature?
http://download.java.net/jdk6/docs/api/javax/annotation/processing/Completion.html
So tempting...Anyone working on any future version 5 type items might still
be able to get away with it(?)
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tacos/Tapestry, team member/developer
Open source b
There are no component docs for 4.1 yet, as was stated in a previous email
in this very thread.
Maintaining component documentation hasn't been a very fun experience thus
far so I'm planning on trying to use TapDoc if I can. Probably need to wrap
it with a maven plugin to make it friendlier with
Didn't see any email sent to infrastructure so I sent one now. I
think I left it unsaid that you should send email to infrastructure
way back when. I should have been more explicit.
On 7/1/06, Kent Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Still no any sign of progress after 3 weeks (
http://article
We have a committer who needs help updating their login password.
The user is Kent Tong (freemanant).
He can be reached at Kent Tong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks!
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 1, 2006 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: still no prog
Where are the component docs for 4.1? I don't see them on the new site.
I'd like to see if I can use 4.1 on my project and replace Tacos.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 11:46 AM
To: Tapestry development
Subject: Re: 4.1 pret
Yeah, I think so..We'll see what happens with client side validation. That
portion will depend on how much people have customized things there. At
least now the client side validates as much as the server side does. (in
that min/max date validate, min/max numbers validate, required clauses work
on
How compatible are the 4.0 and 4.1 versions?
Can I just replace the 4.0 jars with the 4.1 ones?
Thanks,
Norbi
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
Validation is finally done, and I'm going to add the necessary logic to
dynamically add form components today. Does anyone care how I do this?
I was thinking that
Yeah, I wouldn't want to call it stable yet. (Even though it's probably more
stable than any other ajax related tapestry functionality I've seen to date,
there may be more API changes to go through still).
On 7/2/06, KE Gan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alright !!
BTW, this is an "release candida
Alright !!
BTW, this is an "release candidate" kind of version, am I right ? Not a
stable-ready-for-production right ?
~KEGan
On 7/2/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, that's what I'm going to be working on alongside of the continuous
release cycle when people start using it.
Yeah, that's what I'm going to be working on alongside of the continuous
release cycle when people start using it..
I don't normally like to toot my own horn, but this release kind of kicks
ass if I do say so myself. And I do.. ;)
On 7/2/06, KE Gan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jesse,
THANKS
Hi Jesse,
THANKS !! I am really looking forward for 4.1 (especially on Dojo part).
Hope there is enough documentation on the new stuffs, so we could start
exploring :)
~KEGan
On 7/2/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Validation is finally done, and I'm going to add the necessary l
Validation is finally done, and I'm going to add the necessary logic to
dynamically add form components today. Does anyone care how I do this?
I was thinking that initially I'd make the 4.1 snapshot build availability a
little more prominent, followed by a continuous cycle of documentation/4.1
sn
17 matches
Mail list logo
