I believe that the more releases the better. I don't really care if some
issues are fixed in X.Y.1 or X.Y.2. It is just a number.
I would love to see a minor release every month. Even though these releases
contain only few fixes and improvments.
Having said this:
Igor Drobiazko: +1 (non-binding)
I'll leave my vote as it is to indicate how big deal this is for us.
Otherwise I'm 100% behind the alpha. (And waiting impatiently.. :))
- Ville
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
> This isn't a 5.1 final release, it's an alpha release.
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Ville Virtanen
> wrote:
Hoping that TAP5-211 will really be fixed before a final 5.1 release, I'm
changing my vote to
Ulrich Stärk: +0 (non-binding)
Uli
Andreas Andreou schrieb:
Andreas Andreou: +1 (binding)
I'm sure the mentioned issues will be tackled at the next alpha releases
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:48 PM, H
Andreas Andreou: +1 (binding)
I'm sure the mentioned issues will be tackled at the next alpha releases
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> This isn't a 5.1 final release, it's an alpha release.
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Ville Virtanen
> wrote:
>>
>> Ville Vir
+0 (non-binding).
I'm in favor of a release, generally, but I haven't had time to check
out the previous release, personally, and probably won't for a couple
of days.
Robert
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2/196:05 PM , Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
I've created and uploaded a release of Tapestry 5.1.0.0,
