Re: Tapestry: State of the Union

2010-08-16 Thread Dan Adams
Yeah, we've got a lot going on in t5 right now (which is why nobody has heard from me). This month we have 6 t5 sites going live. I've been discussing internally about getting permission to advertise which sites we do are T5 (not that you couldn't figure it out) to help out the project. Dan Ad

Re: Another IllegalAccessError in 5.2 alpha [bug?]

2010-08-16 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 03:48:32 -0300, Igor Drobiazko wrote: So, what is the consensus on fixing the issue? +1 for live reloading of a given service live needing an explicit action from the Tapestry user (i.e. enableReloading()). As it is now, Tapestry-IoC is breaking backward compatibilit

Re: Another IllegalAccessError in 5.2 alpha [bug?]

2010-08-16 Thread Robert Zeigler
I love live service implementation reloading, and I would hate to have to explicitly enable it for every service I create. I'm in favor of the "global on/off switch" as proposed by, eg, Michal Gruca. I'm not sure if it would be feasible to have a global "off" and then an enableReloading() call

Re: Another IllegalAccessError in 5.2 alpha [bug?]

2010-08-16 Thread Kalle Korhonen
I suggested the global flag and enableReloading() in my first post on this thread, but also noted that it might cause even more confusion as more configuration options typically do. Let's remember that this is a development-time feature only so the outcry regarding backwards compatibility is somewh

Re: Another IllegalAccessError in 5.2 alpha [bug?]

2010-08-16 Thread Igor Drobiazko
Agreed. A global flag defaulted to false is a good compromise which ensures backward compatibility. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > I suggested the global flag and enableReloading() in my first post on > this thread, but also noted that it might cause even more confusion

Re: Another IllegalAccessError in 5.2 alpha [bug?]

2010-08-16 Thread Igor Drobiazko
I would prefer a system property, not a symbol. The "global switch on/off" is only for development and you will never override the FactoryDefault's value in ApplicationDefaults. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Robert Zeigler wrote: > I love live service implementation reloading, and I would hat

Re: Another IllegalAccessError in 5.2 alpha [bug?]

2010-08-16 Thread Igor Drobiazko
Sorry, the last message was confusing. Forget the statement about FactoryDefault's and ApplicationDefaults. But there is a challenge. Right now the decision whether a service is reloadable or not is made during binding. At bind time you don't have access to symbols. On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:22 A