The semantics are "the parameter is required. If no value is bound, the
component will TRY to find a default. The lookup for a default value might
be successful or not".
For example, imagine you pass a list of Users to AjaxFormLoop and don't bind
a ValueEncoder. If no ValueEncoder for User is cont
Hi Igor,
I have almost finished Issue 10[1] develoment job, users can
configuration custom. After user choose custom components packages,
and collect all the custom components, they will be available in Web
Page Editor's palette, and also in *.tml's auto-complete list.
I have submited the source
Wow, I am truly stunned. I'm not sure I've ever seen a piece of software so
completely disregard the common sense meaning of a commonly understood word.
So "required" sometimes means "optional if certain conditions are met
elsewhere". And users are just supposed to figure that out on their own???
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> It seems like we're ready to switch to a beta release. This would
> indicate that we should shift focus from major disruptive changes
> towards filling in gaps and fixing bugs (and documenting) with the
> goal being a final release.
> Ho
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Robert Zeigler
wrote:
> We've discussed this in the past. The general consensus was that many users
> were using log4j, and it was better to leave that as the default. Either way
> you can exclude the logging dependency and substitute your favorite package.
> B
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Igor Drobiazko
wrote:
> I'm using http://www.network-science.de/ascii/
BTW Shadow is the best IMHO
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apa
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Creating a branch would make sense. I'd prefer to be more flexible
> than "a feature freeze", unless you think that would motivate people
> to fix more bugs!
Again I would go as Robert suggest to a feature freeze but would not
create a
Hi Everyone
Was looking at new PeriodicExecutorImpl.java. It takes an instance of
a Runnable as a job. What if we could add another convenience method
which would take Class as argument and use
autobuild to create an instance.
--
Regards
Taha Hafeez Siddiqi (tawus)
http://tawus.wordpress.com
-
