On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Dimitris Zenios
wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> Just a side note,Tag 5.3.3 is missing.Any idea why?
>
I'm looking into it.
Cheers
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jochen Frey wrote:
> Does that make the github repo (https://github.com/apache/tapestry5)
> obsolete, or is there a plan to keep a mirror there?
>
> It can work either way, but it'd be good to know if I (and probably others)
> should plan on changing their pro
Hi all,
during the migration process from SVN to GIT (almost complete, we
are 95% I think) I've been warned that the time we have to move away
from Confluence is low.
It there anyone (Uli!?) who knows more then me the current situation?
Cheers
--
Massimo
--
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Dimitris Zenios
wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> Just a side note,Tag 5.3.3 is missing.Any idea why?
Original tag on svn was on the wrong directory so got lost in the
migration, now I've retagged the correct commit.
It should be fine now.
Cheers
--
Massimo
http://meri
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Jochen Frey wrote:
> Couldn't surface anything for "github as a proxy" in a quick 10 minute
> investigation.
>
> I'll assume that the apache git repo will be the way to get current code
> until someone says otherwise.
>
> Thx,
> Jochen
Some guy from infra shou
Hi Howard, does this mean that all future test cases should be in
groovy/spock?
I think it's fair to say that everyone committing patches to Jira will have
Java knowledge. Since a patch is more likely to be included if it has a test
case, I think you are limiting your potential committers by requi
This is still evolving.
If you code in Java, you should learn Spock for testing. If you write
Java web stuff, learn Geb. You will be happy.
That being said, I expect to set things up so that there are specific
packages for JUnit & Spock tests, and others for TestNG. TestNG
claims to be able to
Will do. Thanks for checking into it.
J
On May 17, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Jochen Frey wrote:
>
>> Couldn't surface anything for "github as a proxy" in a quick 10 minute
>> investigation.
>>
>> I'll assume that the apache git repo will be