+1 (non-binding).
2013/7/5 Robert Zeigler
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Robert
>
> On Jul 3, 2013, at 7/32:43 PM , Kalle Korhonen
> wrote:
>
> > Lance Semmens (aka Lance Java) has been one of the most active members on
> > the user list for the past two years. I've personally committed a few
> > pat
+1 (non-binding).
Robert
On Jul 3, 2013, at 7/32:43 PM , Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Lance Semmens (aka Lance Java) has been one of the most active members on
> the user list for the past two years. I've personally committed a few
> patches from him and he is the maintainer of tapestry-stitch (
>
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
Lance Semmens (aka Lance Java) has been one of the most active members on
> the user list for the past two years. I've personally committed a few
> patches from him and he is the maintainer of tapestry-stitch (
> https://github.com/uklance/tape
Alejandro Scandroli: +1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Lance Semmens (aka Lance Java) has been one of the most active members on
> the user list for the past two years. I've personally committed a few
> patches from him and he is the maintainer of tapestry-s
Seperation of concerns is a basic OO principle, I don't see how it relates to
JEE?
Tapestry IoC encourages the use of seperate service definitions and
implementations through bindings, yet it fails to disentangle the concerns of
implementations with these annotations.
John
- Original Mes
