Seperation of concerns is a basic OO principle, I don't see how it relates to
JEE?
Tapestry IoC encourages the use of seperate service definitions and
implementations through bindings, yet it fails to disentangle the concerns of
implementations with these annotations.
John
- Original
Alejandro Scandroli: +1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
Lance Semmens (aka Lance Java) has been one of the most active members on
the user list for the past two years. I've personally committed a few
patches from him and he is the
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.comwrote:
Lance Semmens (aka Lance Java) has been one of the most active members on
the user list for the past two years. I've personally committed a few
patches from him and he is the maintainer of tapestry-stitch (
+1 (non-binding).
Robert
On Jul 3, 2013, at 7/32:43 PM , Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Lance Semmens (aka Lance Java) has been one of the most active members on
the user list for the past two years. I've personally committed a few
patches from him and he is the maintainer
+1 (non-binding).
2013/7/5 Robert Zeigler robert.zeig...@roxanemy.com
+1 (non-binding).
Robert
On Jul 3, 2013, at 7/32:43 PM , Kalle Korhonen kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com
wrote:
Lance Semmens (aka Lance Java) has been one of the most active members on
the user list for the past two
