Re: What are the chances of date picker being fixed / upgraded for T5.4?

2013-09-18 Thread Lenny Primak
Speaking of that, what's the status of tapestry-bootstrap and T5.4? And also is it in maven central yet? On Sep 18, 2013, at 7:53 PM, Barry Books wrote: > I was planing on using modernizr to detect if type="date" is supported. > I've also added min and max to the mixin since they are also supp

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TAP5-2169) Core stack is not included by default

2013-09-18 Thread Barry Books
I agree with Geoff. It's easy to include the core stack in a Layout component. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Lenny Primak wrote: > Technically I agree but it breaks compatibility. So I reluctantly disagree. > > > > On Sep 18, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Geoff Callender < > geoff.callender.jumpst...@gma

Re: What are the chances of date picker being fixed / upgraded for T5.4?

2013-09-18 Thread Barry Books
I was planing on using modernizr to detect if type="date" is supported. I've also added min and max to the mixin since they are also supported by HTML5. I'm sure I'll put in my Bootstrap library and I'll submit it for inclusion in 5.4 but it's not at all compatible with the old DateField. On We

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TAP5-2169) Core stack is not included by default

2013-09-18 Thread Lenny Primak
Technically I agree but it breaks compatibility. So I reluctantly disagree. On Sep 18, 2013, at 7:39 PM, Geoff Callender wrote: > What changed? The JIRA issue says "fixed" but there's no info about how. > > IMHO, it was a FABULOUS decision to emit minimal css classes and NO > stylesheet. De

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TAP5-2169) Core stack is not included by default

2013-09-18 Thread Geoff Callender
What changed? The JIRA issue says "fixed" but there's no info about how. IMHO, it was a FABULOUS decision to emit minimal css classes and NO stylesheet. Developers are free to add the core stack if they wish and free to add refining css classes to the tml. Who agrees/disagreees? On 12 September

Re: What are the chances of date picker being fixed / upgraded for T5.4?

2013-09-18 Thread Geoff Callender
iDevices have their own, great, touch-friendly, date picker for HTML5 type="date", so maybe what's needed is to detect the media type before deciding whether to display a JavaScript datepicker. Similarly, recent releases of Chrome handle type="date" with a pretty good picker, so maybe what's neede

Re: What are the chances of date picker being fixed / upgraded for T5.4?

2013-09-18 Thread Lenny Primak
Sounds great. Are you going to submit a patch to tapestry? If not, Consider contributing this to FlowLogix. You already a committer there. > On Sep 18, 2013, at 5:24 PM, Barry Books wrote: > > I started working on this today. Give the HTML5 spec supporting type="date" > I decided to break thi

Re: What are the chances of date picker being fixed / upgraded for T5.4?

2013-09-18 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
One thing I would look into is to make this new field JavaScript only and have it transfer the data as a hidden field, in the ISO date format. That would help eliminate the class of problems related to client vs. server time zone. I've developed for a client a DatePicker that can also select times

Re: What are the chances of date picker being fixed / upgraded for T5.4?

2013-09-18 Thread Barry Books
I started working on this today. Give the HTML5 spec supporting type="date" I decided to break this into two parts. First I wrote a Translator for the Date class. This means you can now just use TextField for dates if the input type is Date. Since the Translator is contributed in the AppModule you

Re: Tapestry (5.x) Assembly performance - Effect of the ImportWorker

2013-09-18 Thread Michael Wyraz
In my Test application the assembly time is reduced a lot by removing all the assets that are imported using @Import annotation. To show the difference in my real world application, I simply override ImportWorker with a class that does absolute nothing. The effect is: 55s assembly time with Im

Re: Tapestry (5.x) Assembly performance

2013-09-18 Thread Michael Wyraz
I have changed my app to use tapestry 5.4-alpha-22. Now the first page load takes ~1 minute! Subsequent page loads require ~1.5-2 seconds. Hi, a while ago I wrote here about assembly performance in our tapestry app (The thread was titled "Speed up page compiling"). Unfortunately until now I di