The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tapestry-site-production
while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tapestry-site-production/builds/9742
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-cms-slave
Build Reason
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Just give it some time. The votes don't have to come within 72 hours,
> rather the vote has to run for
> at least 72 hours. I for example noticed the thread only today because I'm
> swamped with a lot of
> stuff lately (first child arriving a
Just give it some time. The votes don't have to come within 72 hours, rather
the vote has to run for
at least 72 hours. I for example noticed the thread only today because I'm
swamped with a lot of
stuff lately (first child arriving any day now). I would have checked the
release and, provided
ev
Sorry about that ... yes, we have two +1 but not three.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:42:09 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship
> wrote:
>
> Well, the vote failed; only one binding +1 (mine).
>>
>
> I've voted +1 (binding
On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:42:09 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship
wrote:
Well, the vote failed; only one binding +1 (mine).
I've voted +1 (binding) and mentioned the two issues I think block a final
release. Didn't my message arrive to you guys? Here's a copy of it:
I have two service proxy annotat
Well, the vote failed; only one binding +1 (mine).
Any ideas on when we'll be ready to get an RC out? What are the real
blockers?
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Lance Java
wrote:
> Lance S
> +1 (non-binding)
>
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
The source for Tapestry
Lance S
+1 (non-binding)
On 2015-06-02 02:26, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> I've just fixed a bunch of problems and some low-hanging fruit. 5.4 is long
> overdue, and if not perfect, nothing remaining (to my view) can't wait for
> a 5.4.1 or even a 5.5 (which, I would hope, we be months out, not years!).
>
> I would like the
