Re: Checklist component labels

2011-11-08 Thread Bob Harner
... and many thanks to Igor for fixing those two checklist label issues! Bob Harner On Nov 8, 2011 1:47 AM, "Josh Canfield" wrote: > > That would be really cool, but is it possible to do? > It's harder than making Loop generic because you actually need the > type information within the class. >

Re: Checklist component labels

2011-11-07 Thread Josh Canfield
> That would be really cool, but is it possible to do? It's harder than making Loop generic because you actually need the type information within the class. Looking at it, it might be better to grab the generic info from the parameter binding itself. That is available at runtime, but not currently

Re: Checklist component labels

2011-11-07 Thread Bob Harner
That would be really cool, but is it possible to do? On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Josh Canfield wrote: >>> 3) This component takes an "encoder" parameter but does not support a>> >>> ValueEncoder configured to be provided automatically by Tapestry. > It would be nice to migrate all of the co

Re: Checklist component labels

2011-11-07 Thread Josh Canfield
>> 3) This component takes an "encoder" parameter but does not support a>> >> ValueEncoder configured to be provided automatically by Tapestry. It would be nice to migrate all of the collection based components to a generic form. With the generic information you could also pick the right value en

Re: Checklist component labels

2011-11-07 Thread Bob Harner
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Igor Drobiazko wrote: > hi, > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Bob Harner wrote: > >> Hi everybody, >> >> I've been meaning to bring this up for a while now. The new-for-5.3 >> Checklist component has -- for me -- a couple of minor annoyances: >> >> 1) The label f

Re: Checklist component labels

2011-11-07 Thread Igor Drobiazko
hi, On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Bob Harner wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've been meaning to bring this up for a while now. The new-for-5.3 > Checklist component has -- for me -- a couple of minor annoyances: > > 1) The label for each checkbox is positioned *before* (that is, to the > left of)

Re: Checklist component labels

2011-11-06 Thread Igor Drobiazko
I'll take care of it. On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Bob Harner wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I've been meaning to bring this up for a while now. The new-for-5.3 > Checklist component has -- for me -- a couple of minor annoyances: > > 1) The label for each checkbox is positioned *before* (that is,

Checklist component labels

2011-11-06 Thread Bob Harner
Hi everybody, I've been meaning to bring this up for a while now. The new-for-5.3 Checklist component has -- for me -- a couple of minor annoyances: 1) The label for each checkbox is positioned *before* (that is, to the left of) the checkbox. I think it is much more common to want the label *afte