I have provided a simple fix for TAP5-839, along with a test. Please consider
it for inclusion in 5.1.0.6. .
Cheers,
Peter
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/issues-to-be-fixed-for-5.1.0.6-tp26423770p26616334.html
Sent from the Tapestry - Dev mailing list archive at
Em Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:23:46 -0200, Massimo Lusetti
escreveu:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Robert Zeigler
wrote:
Hrm... I wouldn't hold up the 5.1.0.6 release for backporting those two
issues.
They were pretty hairy, and I wouldn't want to rush the backport. :)
But I imagine we could
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote:
> Hrm... I wouldn't hold up the 5.1.0.6 release for backporting those two
> issues.
> They were pretty hairy, and I wouldn't want to rush the backport. :)
> But I imagine we could cut a 5.1.0.7 down the line?
Completely agree.
--
Massimo
h
Yeah, everybody's fine. Kitchen fire. Stove was inadvertently left
on. House is structurally fine, but needs a fair bit of smoke
remediation.
Robert
On Dec 1, 2009, at 12/14:56 AM , Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
Em Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:46:33 -0200, Robert Zeigler
escreveu:
Ugh,
Em Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:46:33 -0200, Robert Zeigler
escreveu:
Ugh, sorry... not sure... maybe... living out of a hotel right now; had
a house fire on Saturday.
Are you ok? What happened?
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, develope
Hrm... I wouldn't hold up the 5.1.0.6 release for backporting those
two issues.
They were pretty hairy, and I wouldn't want to rush the backport. :)
But I imagine we could cut a 5.1.0.7 down the line?
Robert
On Nov 30, 2009, at 11/302:53 AM , Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:
Ugh, sorry... not sure... maybe... living out of a hotel right now;
had a house fire on Saturday.
I have some other business to take care of first, but then I think I
can get to it (815). On 748... are we just wanting this backported?
Robert
On Nov 30, 2009, at 11/301:11 AM , Igor Drobiazk
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Igor Drobiazko
wrote:
> @Robert: do you see any chance to close the last two issues in the next
> days? We should go on with the release.
For the matter of the next 5.1.0.6 release i would like to ask if
there's a possibility to back port TAP5-103 too (which i th
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Igor Drobiazko
wrote:
> @Robert: do you see any chance to close the last two issues in the next
> days? We should go on with the release.
Yes, it would be nice to go on with the release... :)
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
@Robert: do you see any chance to close the last two issues in the next
days? We should go on with the release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-748
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-815
--
Best regards,
Igor Drobiazko
http://tapestry5.de/blog
t;>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-714
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-711
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Improvements:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-912
>>>
+1
Em Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:25:14 -0200, Igor Drobiazko
escreveu:
Go ahead.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Andreas Andreou
wrote:
btw, any objections against me also applying
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-819 "remove ide-specific
files from all sub-modules and add them t
I would like to put these changes in a later release. As Ulrich already
pointed out we should release 5.1.0.6 asap. It is only possible iff we
backport already fixed issues. If we would fix the both issues you
suggested somebody else could suggest some other issues. This would delay
the release.
Go ahead.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Andreas Andreou wrote:
> btw, any objections against me also applying
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-819 "remove ide-specific
> files from all sub-modules and add them to svn:ignore"
> to the 5.1 branch ?
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:56
btw, any objections against me also applying
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-819 "remove ide-specific
files from all sub-modules and add them to svn:ignore"
to the 5.1 branch ?
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Igor Drobiazko
wrote:
> 14 issues are fixed for 5.1.0.6 now. Please see her
se/TAP5-912
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-814
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-764
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-756
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-138
>>>
Oh, I missed the one for TAP5-834. I can't judge it though, since I'm not familiar with that code or
it's implications.
On second thought, TAP5-774 will probably not make it into 5.1.0.6 due to another reason: It would
break existing applications relying on Tapestry encoding & as &. I feel that
gt; I already began to integrate the fixes to the 5.1.0.x-dev branch and
>>> will
>>> provide a patch covering
>>> those when I'm done.
>>>
>>> Uli
>>>
>>> -
&
TAP5-815 will be in the 5.1.0.6 release, Robert is just holding it open for the
moment.
The other two don't have patches yet and since 5.1.0.6 should be realeased as soon as possible due
to TAP5-815, I doubt that they will make it into the release. If you provide a patch and a test for
TAP5-77
5.1.0.x-dev branch and will
> provide a patch covering
> those when I'm done.
>
> Uli
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this m
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Igor Drobiazko
wrote:
> It would be nice if we could fix them asap and go ahead with the release.
> I'm done for this weekend.
Great work! Thank you very much!
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
done.
Am 22.11.2009 16:27 schrieb Ulrich Stärk:
Great work!
I will create a non-conflicting patch for TAP5-749, now that T5-779 is
fixed.
Uli
Igor Drobiazko schrieb:
14 issues are fixed for 5.1.0.6 now. Please see here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&
Great work!
I will create a non-conflicting patch for TAP5-749, now that T5-779 is
fixed.
Uli
Igor Drobiazko schrieb:
14 issues are fixed for 5.1.0.6 now. Please see here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310833&status=6&fixfor=12314399
The remaini
14 issues are fixed for 5.1.0.6 now. Please see here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310833&status=6&fixfor=12314399
The remaining issues (if I didn't miss something) are:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-749
https://issues.apache.org/jira/br
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Here is a short status update:
Very good work Ulrich.
Thank you very much.
Cheers
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tapestr
Here is a short status update:
Am 19.11.2009 11:17 schrieb Ulrich Stärk:
For the 5.1.0.6 release, I'd suggest to backport the fixes for the
following issues:
Bugs:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-913
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-779
done.
https://issues.apache.org
For the 5.1.0.6 release, I'd suggest to backport the fixes for the following
issues:
Bugs:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-913
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-779
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-767
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-755
https://issues.a
27 matches
Mail list logo
