I think there are various options here:
1) Leave as is, with separate release cycles etc.
2) Migrate into Phoenix code base, release together with phoenix, but as
separate, independent artifacts
3) Tightly integrate into Phoenix, essentially removing support for using
them independently
I
Hi, my ID is anew and I intend to continue contributing to Tephra.
-Andreas
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 1:39 PM Gokul Gunasekaran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to continue working on Tephra. My id is gokul.
>
> Gokul
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:25 AM Josh Elser wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As a part of
+1
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:28 PM James Taylor
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:21 PM Alan Gates wrote:
>
> > I propose that the Tephra project leave the incubator and become part of
> > the Phoenix project. The Phoenix project has proposed to incorporate
> both
> > Omid and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16961493#comment-16961493
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
It's been a while, I agree a release would be good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann updated TEPHRA-302:
---
Summary: Add tests and examples for HBase 1.5.x (was: Add tests for HBase
1.5.x)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-303.
Resolution: Fixed
> HBase 1.1 tests don't comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann reassigned TEPHRA-302:
--
Assignee: Andreas Neumann (was: Poorna Chandra)
> Add tests for HBase 1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16903170#comment-16903170
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
Since there don't seem to be any objections, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16891468#comment-16891468
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
[~lhofhansl] do you think this is good to merge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16890317#comment-16890317
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
I also restructures the build so that it pass in Travis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-304.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.16.0-incubating
> Remove Support for Jav
Looks like there are no objections. I have created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-304 and will send a PR soon.
-Andreas
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:02 PM Terence Yim wrote:
> +1 from me for removing Java 7 support.
>
> Terence
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:22 AM
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-304:
--
Summary: Remove Support for Java 7
Key: TEPHRA-304
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-304
Project: Tephra
Issue Type: Improvement
All,
Java 7 has long reached the end of its life support, yet Tephra still
supports and tests with Java 7. After the recent change to use HTTPS, Java
7 causes repeated test failures, caused by its lack of support for TLS 1.2 (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16882281#comment-16882281
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
Java 7 build fail due to this:
[https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16882277#comment-16882277
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
Then, is the above good to merge? I will start
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16878152#comment-16878152
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
This PR seems to fix it It is a bit of a restructuring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16875244#comment-16875244
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
Running mvn --debug, I see that it uses:
{code:java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16875239#comment-16875239
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
It failed for me on Linux, where I have maven 3.6.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16875223#comment-16875223
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
Looks like my versions I slightly different.
{code:java
ional tables, there’s a lot about that
> > which makes sense.
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 21, 2019, at 3:36 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello everybody,
> > >
> > > Observing that this project is not making much progress towards
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16874537#comment-16874537
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
It succeeds for me. When I run the same command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16874250#comment-16874250
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-303:
Interesting, how did this pass the travis build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16873698#comment-16873698
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-301:
I think it's ok to commit this. Can you open a Jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16873686#comment-16873686
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-301:
I think you should still add tests for Hbase-1.5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16873623#comment-16873623
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-301:
+1 to James' comment. We can just use the 1.4 module
Hello everybody,
Observing that this project is not making much progress towards graduation,
the community has not grown much over the last year, and not many new
features have been added, activity overall is pretty low and the project
seems a bit stagnating.
I am wondering whether we should
Thanks for the quick responses. Submitting it to wiki now. -Andreas
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:44 PM James Taylor wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:36 PM Terence Yim wrote:
>
> > +1 from me
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 4:35 PM Andreas Neumann wr
All, please see the proposed report for this month. It's a bit of a last
notice as it is due to day, so please send me feedback if I got anything
wrong.
Cheers -Andreas
Tephra is a system for providing globally consistent transactions on top of
Apache HBase and other storage engines.
Tephra has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16846268#comment-16846268
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-300:
I think it would be at least required in 2.0?
> Tep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16846259#comment-16846259
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-300:
The change LGTM.
Since this applies to older HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16842802#comment-16842802
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-299:
Please go ahead. Looks like [~poornachandra] already
Hi Varun,
for debugging purposes, you should only need to read the last snapshot and
the transaction log that follows it. Older snapshots should not be needed.
Tephra does not have a CLI tool to do that yet, CDAP (which uses Tephra)
has a similar tool, however a little more complex because it
1) our transactions are in-fact using Tephra snapshot isolation
> 2) any lower level Tephra transaction details which may help us
> troubleshoot this issue, if and when it occurs again?
>
> Thanks very much
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:05 PM Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
&g
Hey Varun,
I think the issue is that your code starts the second transaction before
the first one has committed (inside the outer @Transactional). Because of
snapshot isolation, the second transaction cannot see the writes from the
first one. I see tw ways to make it work:
1. Remove the
LGTM. Thanks for putting it together, Poorna.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:46 PM Poorna Chandra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please review the proposed incubator report for Tephra. I'm add it to the
> incubator wiki later this afternoon.
>
> Thanks,
> Poorna
>
>
>
> Tephra
Hi Curtis,
All changes to the transaction state, including in-process transactions,
are captured in the transaction log. When a failover occurs, the new
transaction manager recreates the entire transaction state by replaying the
log from the last snapshot. In-flight transactions should still be
Hey, I think it is already supported - it was added in 0.14.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-272
Do you see any issues using it with HBase 2.0?
Cheers -Andreas
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:17 AM Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
jean-m...@spaggiari.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-293:
--
Summary: Transaction Log is logging too verbosely
Key: TEPHRA-293
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-293
Project: Tephra
Issue Type
being a
> subproject.
>
> Andreas, do you agree that Tephra is ready to start thinking about
> graduation?
>
> Alan.
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:48 AM Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> > My 2 cents:
> >
> > I think in its current scope, Tephra is quite mature and comple
My 2 cents:
I think in its current scope, Tephra is quite mature and complete.
The next big step would be to implement a fully distributed transaction
manager, with replication and consensus protocol to ensure consistency.
That would be a major undertaking and I am not sure that it would be
done. Thanks for your input.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote:
> +1, thanks Andreas!
>
> Poorna.
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 9:38 AM Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> > Good point, I will add that.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 6:13 PM, James Ta
Good point, I will add that.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 6:13 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> How about adding mention of 0.14.0 release under the “How has the project
> developed since the last report?” section?
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 5:36 PM Andreas Neumann wrote:
>
> > H
Hi All,
Please review the draft of the incubator reportand let me know if any
changes are needed. I will otherwise add it to the wiki tomorrow (which is
the due date).
Thanks, -Andreas
Tephra
Tephra is a system for providing globally consistent transactions on top of
Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16488485#comment-16488485
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-291:
HBase, for example, has
[https://git-wip-us.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16483282#comment-16483282
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-291:
Thanks for the patch, [~jamestaylor].
I am wondering
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-291:
--
Summary: Notice file is outdated
Key: TEPHRA-291
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-291
Project: Tephra
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 7:42 AM Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for updating the KEYS.
> >
> > - validated all checksums
> > - ran build and tests
> > - checked LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER
> >
> > My only concern is th
t; > signed with my "CODE SIGNING KEY": 308FBEE06088BE0F. Sorry for any
> > confusion.
> >
> > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +0
> > >
> > > - sha512 checksum matcnes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16423226#comment-16423226
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-269:
Nice design! A couple of comments:
* would it make sense
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16412073#comment-16412073
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-285:
Until this is fixed in HBase, we should exclude
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-279.
Resolution: Fixed
> If getTransactionAwareName() throws an exception, abort() d
+1
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:41 AM, James Taylor
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Poorna Chandra
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > >
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-282.
Resolution: Fixed
> Travis builds fail due to time
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-282:
--
Summary: Travis builds fail due to timeout
Key: TEPHRA-282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-282
Project: Tephra
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann updated TEPHRA-278:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.14.0-incubating
> Support HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-278.
Resolution: Fixed
> Support HBase 1.4
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16327459#comment-16327459
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-278:
OK, I will create a Jira for the build timeout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16327452#comment-16327452
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-247:
Yes, the in-progress list can grow large. A would think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16326505#comment-16326505
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-278:
Hmmm. According to this:
[https://docs.travis-ci.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16326493#comment-16326493
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-247:
I do see that it could be possible to work around
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann reassigned TEPHRA-279:
--
Assignee: Andreas Neumann (was: Poorna Chandra)
> If getTransactionAwareName() thr
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-281:
--
Summary: TransactionContext should allow sub-classes to manage the
tx-awares
Key: TEPHRA-281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-281
Project
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-280:
--
Summary: TransactionContext is too chatty
Key: TEPHRA-280
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-280
Project: Tephra
Issue Type: Improvement
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-279:
--
Summary: If getTransactionAwareName() throws an exception, abort()
does not happen
Key: TEPHRA-279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-279
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16323117#comment-16323117
]
Andreas Neumann edited comment on TEPHRA-247 at 1/11/18 10:42 PM:
--
Hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16323117#comment-16323117
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-247:
Hi Patr
> Avoid encoding the transaction multiple ti
+1 looks good
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please review the draft incubator report for Tephra. Let me know if any
> changes are required. The report is due tomorrow. I'm planning to add it to
> the wiki tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
> Poorna.
>
do you
think?
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Micael,
>
> mixing transactional and non-transactional writes in the same table is
> risky, and you spotted one of the issues with that. Tephra inserts a
> "family delete marker&q
n Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi James,
> >
> > do you have logs from that test run? There can be different reasons:
> > - the test started before Tephra was initialized, in that case maybe wait
> > until it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16202550#comment-16202550
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-257:
It turns out that this cannot be fixed as long as Tephra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-257.
Resolution: Won't Fix
> If start() encounters an RPC timeout, an invalid transact
Hi All,
The Apache Tephra team is excited to announce the latest release of
Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating. This is the sixth release of Apache Tephra.
Apache Tephra is a transaction engine for distributed data stores like
Apache HBase. It provides ACID semantics for concurrent data operations
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-264:
--
Summary: When transaction size limits are exceeded, the error
message should indicate what configuration to change in order to increase the
limit
Key: TEPHRA-264
URL: https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16170385#comment-16170385
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-99:
---
Unfortunately, there is no easy way for a client to find out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168069#comment-16168069
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-99:
---
Conceptually that can work. There are only two caveats
Hi all,
This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.13.0-incubating,
release candidate 2. This is the sixth release of Tephra.
The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tephra/0.
13.0-incubating-rc2/src
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16167194#comment-16167194
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-99:
---
You only need to worry about updateTx() if you use
es Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1. Verified that all Phoenix unit tests pass with the RC.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 PM Andreas Neumann <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This is a cal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166619#comment-16166619
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-99:
---
It seems what you really need is a read-only transaction
Hi James,
excellent timing! We were just looking at remaining issues and moved them
out to 0.14, none of them were critical or show-stoppers, and should not
hold back a release that supports Hbase 1.3.
We are planning to prepare the release and send out the vote tonight.
If you want to help, we'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann updated TEPHRA-245:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.13.0-incubating)
0.14.0-incubating
> Impr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann updated TEPHRA-204:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.13.0-incubating)
0.14.0-incubating
> Docum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-219.
Resolution: Fixed
Remaining refactoring work will be done in TEPHRA-262
> Setup pro
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-262:
--
Summary: Refactoring to remove Security dependencies from the
Pruning classes
Key: TEPHRA-262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-262
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann updated TEPHRA-243:
---
Summary: Fix concurrency issues in Transaction log writer; also improve the
logging
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-243.
Resolution: Fixed
> Fix concurrency issues in Transaction log writer; also impr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-261.
Resolution: Fixed
> Make TransactionSystemTest.getCommonConfiguration() protec
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-261:
--
Summary: Make TransactionSystemTest.getCommonConfiguration()
protected
Key: TEPHRA-261
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-261
Project: Tephra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-258.
Resolution: Fixed
> Improve log message for Thrift client connect
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-259:
--
Summary: Exception handlers should only log an exception if they
don't rethrow it
Key: TEPHRA-259
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-259
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16162310#comment-16162310
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-258:
Also, the AbstractClientProvider has very verbose logging
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-258:
--
Summary: Improve log message for Thrift client connection
Key: TEPHRA-258
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-258
Project: Tephra
Issue
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-256:
--
Summary: Transaction Log Synchronization is overly complex and too
restrictive
Key: TEPHRA-256
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-256
Project
Andreas Neumann created TEPHRA-255:
--
Summary: PruneUpperBoundWriterSupplierTest is flaky
Key: TEPHRA-255
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-255
Project: Tephra
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann resolved TEPHRA-253.
Resolution: Fixed
> TransactionProcessorTest is sometimes fl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16160097#comment-16160097
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-253:
Fix is to wait with the flush until the transaction state
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann updated TEPHRA-253:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.13.0-incubating
> TransactionProcessorTest is sometimes fl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16160061#comment-16160061
]
Andreas Neumann commented on TEPHRA-253:
Suspicion confirmed. After changing travis to dump
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Neumann reassigned TEPHRA-253:
--
Assignee: Andreas Neumann (was: Poorna Chandra)
> TransactionProcessorT
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo