[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14510799#comment-14510799
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-2441:
Github user jeking3 commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14510808#comment-14510808
]
James E. King, III commented on THRIFT-2941:
This pull request failed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511098#comment-14511098
]
Ben Craig commented on THRIFT-2441:
---
committed. Thanks jeking3!
Cannot shutdown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ben Craig resolved THRIFT-2441.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Cannot shutdown TThreadedServer when clients are still connected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511479#comment-14511479
]
James E. King, III commented on THRIFT-3081:
I don't quite understand why
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511166#comment-14511166
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3081:
GitHub user jeking3 opened a pull
Github user jeking3 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/424#issuecomment-95952386
Committed - closing pull request.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user jeking3 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/460
bugfix/THRIFT-3081 consolidate client processing loops in simple and
threaded servers
This provides consistency to client handling throughout the client
lifecycle across all the simple and
Github user jeking3 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/460#issuecomment-95976890
1249.8 failed in javascript - I did not touch javascript; recycling the
pull request to kick a new build
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user jeking3 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/460
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jeking3 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/460#issuecomment-95959732
Actually the merge is correct; I don't know why github decided to make it
difficult. The diffs are accurate.
I did this work on top of THRIFT-2441 on my fork.
GitHub user mreve opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/461
Support negative hex literals in IDL
As it is now, the parser doesn't allow hex constant values to be negative
(it throws a 'bad syntax' error).
The change updates the regex and the code that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511261#comment-14511261
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-233:
---
GitHub user mreve opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511148#comment-14511148
]
Hudson commented on THRIFT-2441:
SUCCESS: Integrated in Thrift #1517 (See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511268#comment-14511268
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3081:
Github user jeking3 commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511270#comment-14511270
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3081:
GitHub user jeking3 reopened a pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511269#comment-14511269
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3081:
Github user jeking3 closed the pull
GitHub user jeking3 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/460
bugfix/THRIFT-3081 consolidate client processing loops in simple and
threaded servers
This provides consistency to client handling throughout the client
lifecycle across all the simple and
Github user jeking3 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/460#issuecomment-95956705
Yuck, bad merge. Something odd happened. Checking into it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user nsuke commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/450#issuecomment-96126819
No, Jenkins not calling cross tests made the difference.
In fact, the log shows that Jenkins doesn't even **build** following
languages at all (Building : no):
Github user nsuke commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/450#issuecomment-95990799
How about having unified base for testing ?
Can we have build scripts **inside** the repository and invoke them from
both Jenkins and Travis/Appveyer ?
---
If your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511325#comment-14511325
]
Nobuaki Sukegawa commented on THRIFT-3111:
--
I thought you were intending to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511330#comment-14511330
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3000:
Github user nsuke commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511345#comment-14511345
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-2850:
Github user nsuke commented on a diff in
Github user nsuke commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/456#discussion_r29066107
--- Diff: lib/cpp/src/thrift/transport/TSSLSocket.cpp ---
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ void TSSLSocket::checkHandshake() {
return;
}
ssl_ =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-2850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511548#comment-14511548
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-2850:
Github user jeking3 commented on a diff
Github user jeking3 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/456#discussion_r29076042
--- Diff: lib/cpp/src/thrift/transport/TSSLSocket.cpp ---
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ void TSSLSocket::checkHandshake() {
return;
}
ssl_ =
Github user Jens-G commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/450#issuecomment-96044497
They both call the usual suspects: ```bootstrapsh configure make
...``` or ```cmake```. The environment makes the difference.
---
If your project is set up for it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511618#comment-14511618
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3000:
Github user Jens-G commented on the pull
29 matches
Mail list logo
