Github user erikvanoosten commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
The specification documents are up at
https://erikvanoosten.github.io/thrift-missing-specification/.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user erikvanoosten commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
The feedback cycle took more then a month. This is too long for me. I do
not have the mental capacity to keep work in my head for that long.
Kind regards,
Erik.
Github user erikvanoosten commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
Feel free to take it. I won't support it anymore though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user Jens-G commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
Thanks for the reminder. Actually, I like it. Too bad it's closed now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Jens-G commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
Why?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user erikvanoosten commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
Closing this due to lack of interest of repo owners.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user erikvanoosten commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
All, @Jens-G, this documentation is ready for another review. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user erikvanoosten commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
Note: last commit is still work in progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user erikvanoosten commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
@Jens-G wrote:
> The Thrift compiler prevents the combination of oneway plus throws right
from the start since March 2003, any types other than void are disallowed since
THRIFT-2030. So th
Github user erikvanoosten commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
Thanks @Jens-G . That's all useful feedback. Next week I have time to work
on it further.
Regarding structure: it took me weeks to collect all this information and
create the document
Github user Jens-G commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1036
Overall pretty neat. I still have a few complaints.
1. The document repeats a lot of stuff that can be found elsewhere, e.g. in
the Thrift Whitepaper. There is nothing per se wrong with repea
11 matches
Mail list logo
