Re: C++ reviewers for PR 2151 wanted

2020-06-09 Thread Randy Abernethy
Just took a look. +1 On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:59 AM max ulidtko wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm the PR author — calling out for reviewers! > > The diff is under 1 kLoC. > > I have it well-groomed already: > • CI bots are green; > • new code is clang-formatted; > • entry in CHANGES.md added; > •

Re: C++ reviewers for PR 2151 wanted

2020-06-09 Thread max ulidtko
Hi list, I'm the PR author — calling out for reviewers! The diff is under 1 kLoC. I have it well-groomed already: • CI bots are green; • new code is clang-formatted; • entry in CHANGES.md added; • both buildsystems adjusted for new file; • non-pertinent changes split off; • Jens Geyer's

Re: C++ reviewers for PR 2151 wanted

2020-05-28 Thread Mario Emmenlauer
Hi Jens and all, I'll try to spend a bit of time with the PR and validate the code works for us. I'm not sure I qualify as a reviewer yet but I'll at least try to make an informed guess. The PR does indeed address a relevant concern: currently Thrift C++ server sockets will only pick _one_ of

C++ reviewers for PR 2151 wanted

2020-05-28 Thread Jens Geyer
Hi all, the PR creator is a bit hesitant about it, so I ask for him: If there is any C++ developer out there who feels like spending a share of his/her valuable time to review this PR, that would be a great thing. But be warned, there is a reason for this request: The patch is a bit more