#x27;d like to make it a real union
>>
>> How wil this affect compatibility of the Thrift language bindungs in
>> general? Unions are widely used, not only for the plugin interface.
>>
>> JensG
>>
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> From: Ch
> I'd like to make it a real union
>
> How wil this affect compatibility of the Thrift language bindungs in
> general? Unions are widely used, not only for the plugin interface.
>
> JensG
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> From: Chet Murthy
> Sent: Satur
From: Chet Murthy
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 12:58 AM
To: dev@thrift.apache.org
Subject: Is anybody using the plugin.thrift interface? I'd like to change a
little bit of it
In another email thread about unions, I've noted that the current Thrift
union implementation isn't actual
THRIFT-4401 and backwards through JIRA.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
From: Ben Craig
Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2017 3:15 AM
To: Thrift-Dev
Subject: Re: Is anybody using the plugin.thrift interface? I'd like to
change a little bit of it
Find the person that did the initial work an
Find the person that did the initial work and ask them directly. That
person is likely the main user.
On Dec 1, 2017 5:58 PM, "Chet Murthy" wrote:
> In another email thread about unions, I've noted that the current Thrift
> union implementation isn't actually a union. It's just a struct with
>
In another email thread about unions, I've noted that the current Thrift
union implementation isn't actually a union. It's just a struct with
all-optional fields. I'd like to make it a real union, but this will break
the behaviour of the Thrift plugin interface, b/c it uses unions
(t_const_value)
