Re: The JavaME library is rotting - do we need it?

2018-12-30 Thread James E. King III
ficant chunk of the project’s JIRAs, focus on a > single Java target would have the added advantage of cleaning up the bug > tracker. > > Allen > > > -- > *From:* James E. King III > *Sent:* Sunday, December 30, 2018 9:58 AM > *To:* dev@t

Re: The JavaME library is rotting - do we need it?

2018-12-30 Thread Allen George
*To:* dev@thrift.apache.org *Subject:* The JavaME library is rotting - do we need it? Before calling a vote on this, the last checkins to lib/javame were in 2015, and when you compare the sources to what's in lib/java, the differences are that the lib/java library has received updates, but th

Re: The JavaME library is rotting - do we need it?

2018-12-30 Thread Allen George
, December 30, 2018 9:58 AM To: dev@thrift.apache.org Subject: The JavaME library is rotting - do we need it? Before calling a vote on this, the last checkins to lib/javame were in 2015, and when you compare the sources to what's in lib/java, the differences are that the lib/java library has rec

The JavaME library is rotting - do we need it?

2018-12-30 Thread James E. King III
Before calling a vote on this, the last checkins to lib/javame were in 2015, and when you compare the sources to what's in lib/java, the differences are that the lib/java library has received updates, but the lib/javame library has not. For example a configurable maximum frame size. Do we really