W dniu 2011-12-16 20:32, Jukka Zitting pisze:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Antoni Mylka wrote:
The moment upstream libraries start depending in tika-core, they stop being
upstream libraries and become "side-stream" libraries. Putting POI between
core and parsers in the dependency chain
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Antoni Mylka wrote:
> I don't want to start new flames and understand that the current status quo
> is probably the best possible, given all requirements, yet let's not get
> carried away about creating yet another ultimate solution.
I was just thinking of st
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Antoni Mylka wrote:
> The moment upstream libraries start depending in tika-core, they stop being
> upstream libraries and become "side-stream" libraries. Putting POI between
> core and parsers in the dependency chain will bring all sorts of issues due
> to in
W dniu 2011-12-16 16:12, Jukka Zitting pisze:
* Consistency - both or markup and metadata keys will be harder to
ensure when it isn't in the same codebase
Yep, that can be a problem. I guess the ultimate solution to this
would be to come up with a well documented definition of what a parser
s
W dniu 2011-12-16 16:12, Jukka Zitting pisze:
And who's job would it be to test it? That's a general thing actually, how
much testing would need to remain on the Tika side?
I'd still have the upstream libraries as dependencies of tika-parsers,
and we definitely should continue maintaining a goo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13171098#comment-13171098
]
Antoni Mylka commented on TIKA-810:
---
That's a very important question IMHO, crucial to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13171040#comment-13171040
]
Jeremy Anderson edited comment on TIKA-810 at 12/16/11 4:50 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13171040#comment-13171040
]
Jeremy Anderson edited comment on TIKA-810 at 12/16/11 4:28 PM:
--
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> It's true users could directly upgrade their PDFBox w/owaiting for a
> Tika release but I suspect most users don't do that...
Currently people don't do that because it's so easy to break things by
upgrading a parser library in sync
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> A couple of issues do spring to mind with this plan:
Good points.
> * Metadata keys - if a parser enhancement or new feature needs a new
> metadata key, then you end up having to wait for a new tika release to
> get it (so you can add
10 matches
Mail list logo
