Re: Metadata situation and XMP support in Tika

2012-04-10 Thread Ray Gauss II
Hi Jörg, As you've seen from TIKA-859 and TIKA-842 I've had to deal with similar issues. Those issues were needed by TIKA-774 which itself contains another mapping that converts the data output by ExifTool to the proper IPTC metadata defined in TIKA-842. The code for the ExifTool parser is now

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-774) ExifTool Parser

2012-04-10 Thread Ray Gauss II (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13251089#comment-13251089 ] Ray Gauss II commented on TIKA-774: --- The code for the ExifTool parser has been moved to h

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-776) ExifTool Embedder

2012-04-10 Thread Ray Gauss II (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13251091#comment-13251091 ] Ray Gauss II commented on TIKA-776: --- The code for the ExifTool embedder has been moved to

Re: PUT vs. POST in tika-server

2012-04-10 Thread Ingo Renner
Am 05.04.2012 um 10:29 schrieb Jukka Zitting: Hi all, > IMO a more appropriate verb to use is POST, that's meant (among other > things) for: +1, I'd also prefer to have POST, also as the default. best Ingo -- Ingo Renner TYPO3 Core Developer, Release Manager TYPO3 4.2, Admin Google Summer o