[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2341) Upgrade to commons compress 1.14 when available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16033572#comment-16033572 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-2341: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika-trunk #1283 (See [h

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2360) Handle SentimentParser resource failure more robustly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16033568#comment-16033568 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-2360: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika-trunk #1283 (See [h

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2381) Include tika-eval artifact in release

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16033567#comment-16033567 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-2381: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika-trunk #1283 (See [h

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2383) Upgrade forbiddenapis to 2.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16033570#comment-16033570 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-2383: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika-trunk #1283 (See [h

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2379) tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package which does not exists

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16033517#comment-16033517 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2379: --- Thank you [~bobpaulin]! [~cib...@e-ma.net], any cha

[jira] [Resolved] (TIKA-2341) Upgrade to commons compress 1.14 when available

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Allison resolved TIKA-2341. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Tim Allison Fix Version/s: 1.16 > Upgrade to commons compre

Re: Tika 1.16?

+1 On 6/1/2017 6:50 AM, Allison, Timothy B. wrote: > Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with 1.15, does it make sense > to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks? > > Cheers, > > Tim > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: experiences with Tika in Docker

As the Tika project starts embracing more non Java tools (I’m thinking of Tesseract for example), dockerizing your Tika setup becomes more and more valuable. For example, I run my tests for my application on my local Mac, as well as on CircleCI. I have a dockeriezed Tika service that does

[jira] [Created] (TIKA-2383) Upgrade forbiddenapis to 2.3

Tim Allison created TIKA-2383: - Summary: Upgrade forbiddenapis to 2.3 Key: TIKA-2383 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2383 Project: Tika Issue Type: Improvement Reporte

RE: experiences with Tika in Docker

Thank you, Thejan! -Original Message- From: Thejan Wijesinghe [mailto:thejan.k.wijesin...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 5:40 PM To: dev@tika.apache.org Subject: Re: experiences with Tika in Docker Hi Tim, I've used Tika -server in docker but as a single instance only. Yes, it

Tika 1.16?

Given the broken OSGi and the org.json issues with 1.15, does it make sense to aim for 1.16 fairly soon, say 3-4 weeks? Cheers, Tim