[GitHub] [tika] PeterAlfredLee opened a new pull request #369: Use IOException instead of IOExceptionWithCause

PeterAlfredLee opened a new pull request #369: URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/369 We used to use` IOExceptionWithCause` because `IOException` with the `Throwable` constructors is missing before `JDK 6`. I think we should use `IOException` after `JDK 6`. --

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3210) tika status endpoint should have a Node UUID

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17216694#comment-17216694 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3210: --- That's helpful. Thank you! > tika status endpoint

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3209) Different between PictureRunMapper in POI and PicturesSource in Tika

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17216827#comment-17216827 ] Nick Burch commented on TIKA-3209: -- I've taken a look at the code in POI and Tika today,

[jira] [Resolved] (TIKA-3210) tika status endpoint should have a Node UUID

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Allison resolved TIKA-3210. --- Fix Version/s: 1.25 Resolution: Fixed Added "server_id" and "num_restarts" to {{/status}} endpo

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3204) License incompliance with xmp-core 6.1.10

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17217067#comment-17217067 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3204: --- Thank you, [~lrosenthol]! Once xmpcore with a fixe

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3210) tika status endpoint should have a Node UUID

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17217116#comment-17217116 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-3210: -- UNSTABLE: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-branch1x-jd

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3210) tika status endpoint should have a Node UUID

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3210?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17217120#comment-17217120 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-3210: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-main-jdk8 #3

[GitHub] [tika] PeterAlfredLee commented on pull request #369: Use IOException instead of IOExceptionWithCause

PeterAlfredLee commented on pull request #369: URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/369#issuecomment-712531011 @kkrugler Thank you for reviewing this. >I don't see the IOExceptionWithCause class being deprecated `IOExceptionWithCause` in `Tika` was copying from `commons-io 1.4`

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3209) Different between PictureRunMapper in POI and PicturesSource in Tika

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17217212#comment-17217212 ] Peter Lee commented on TIKA-3209: - Hi [~nick] Just replace PicturesSource in Tika with Pi

[GitHub] [tika] kkrugler commented on pull request #369: Use IOException instead of IOExceptionWithCause

kkrugler commented on pull request #369: URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/369#issuecomment-712571231 If this change is only going into main, then my question is whether you removed the `IOExceptionWithCause` class from Tika (maybe I missed that), and if not, why not?

[GitHub] [tika] PeterAlfredLee commented on pull request #369: Use IOException instead of IOExceptionWithCause

PeterAlfredLee commented on pull request #369: URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/369#issuecomment-712624719 I'm also agree to remove the `IOExceptionWithCause` class from Tika. The reason why this PR wasn't removing `IOExceptionWithCause` class is because consider [TaggedIOExcept