[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17322487#comment-17322487
]
Tim Allison edited comment on TIKA-3263 at 4/15/21, 9:25 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17322487#comment-17322487
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3263:
---
[~kkrugler], I wasn't around when this was implemen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17322479#comment-17322479
]
Aaron Weber edited comment on TIKA-3263 at 4/15/21, 8:55 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17322479#comment-17322479
]
Aaron Weber commented on TIKA-3263:
---
Just ran into this as well. Being able to catch th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17322398#comment-17322398
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-3357:
--
Subhajitdas298 opened a new pull request #427
Subhajitdas298 opened a new pull request #427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/427
Added Resource comparator based to produce type.
In an ambiguous call, request handler will be chosen based on the type of
data it returns.
**Current priority is set as:**
MediaType.TEXT
Subhajit Das created TIKA-3357:
--
Summary: Remove ambiguity in request handlers
Key: TIKA-3357
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3357
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Improvement
It wasn't a totally clean pull, but I didn't have anything else there. I had
stuff in other branches, but when it failed, I tried it on a clean main.
Here's the command line I used: mvn clean install -pl
:tika-parsers-classic-package -am
Since my pull request was processed with no probl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17322319#comment-17322319
]
Hudson commented on TIKA-3355:
--
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-branch1x-jdk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17322318#comment-17322318
]
Hudson commented on TIKA-3355:
--
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-main-jdk8 #1
HI found a couple of other things that I fixed on Windows just now,
but I'm not able to replicate it. Are you getting that failure with a
clean pull/clone?
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:48 AM Tim Allison wrote:
> Thank you for sharing!
>
> Not able to replicate on linux...trying my Windows
tballison merged pull request #426:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/426
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison resolved TIKA-3356.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
the unit test is concatenating recursive metadata content...that
is an ill
Tim Allison created TIKA-3356:
-
Summary: Broken xhtml with extractImages in 2.x
Key: TIKA-3356
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3356
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Task
Repo
Thank you for sharing!
Not able to replicate on linux...trying my Windows laptop.
Unrelated...there's something really broken with the xhtml in that there
are two bodies. I can replicate this on linux. Will open an issue...
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:04 AM Peter Kronenberg
wrote:
> We’re get
peterkronenberg commented on pull request #426:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/426#issuecomment-820450345
Was doing some error recovery testing on the config files for my own
application, and discovered that the exception handling for an invalid config
value had too many layers i
peterkronenberg opened a new pull request #426:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/426
Thanks for your contribution to [Apache Tika](https://tika.apache.org/)!
Your help is appreciated!
Before opening the pull request, please verify that
* there is an open issue on the [Tika
We're getting a test failure. I don't see any recent check-ins that would be
causing this, so maybe it's been there for awhile (I don't always run the tests)
[INFO] Results:
[INFO]
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR]
TesseractOCRParserTest.testOCROutputsHOCR:105->TikaTest.assertContains:79 http://www.w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17321960#comment-17321960
]
Arnaud MERGEY edited comment on TIKA-3354 at 4/15/21, 7:18 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17321960#comment-17321960
]
Arnaud MERGEY commented on TIKA-3354:
-
digging more about this I think I found the exp
20 matches
Mail list logo
