Re: [DISCUSS] 3.x?

2023-08-25 Thread Tim Allison
> I doubt you can EOL 2.x in case you are planing to move to Jackarta IMO these 2 worlds will live in parallel much longer :( Ugh. Ok. Y, I'm worried about our dependencies, not sure if that plays into it? > In case you are planing to have one branch maybe it worth to do something like this: http

Re: [DISCUSS] 3.x?

2023-08-25 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 21:22, Tim Allison wrote: > > > I doubt you can EOL 2.x in case you are planing to move to Jackarta IMO > these 2 worlds will live in parallel much longer :( > Ugh. Ok. Y, I'm worried about our dependencies, not sure if that plays > into it? Not sure what do you mean by "o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tika 2.9.0 Candidate #1

2023-08-25 Thread Konstantin Gribov
Hi, folks. Built successfully on ArchLinux, OpenJdk 11 & 17 (Temurin 11.0.20+8 and 17.0.8+7) with tesseract 5.3.2 and leptonica 1.83.1. SHA512 and GPG signatures look fine to me. [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 2.9.0 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... -- Best regards, Ko

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tika 2.9.0 Candidate #1

2023-08-25 Thread Oleg Tikhonov
Here is mine +1 Thanks On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 11:48 Konstantin Gribov wrote: > Hi, folks. > > Built successfully on ArchLinux, OpenJdk 11 & 17 (Temurin 11.0.20+8 and > 17.0.8+7) with tesseract 5.3.2 and leptonica 1.83.1. > > SHA512 and GPG signatures look fine to me. > > [x] +1 Release this pac