e.org"
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
>I just remembered TIKA-1509 and TIKA-1558 -- testing now for blacklist
>functionality through TIKA-1509. If that works, I'll back out TIKA-1558.
>
>Tim, I think you should run govdocs from the RC, in case something changes
&g
++
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Palsulich
Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 at 3:22 PM
To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
>I just remembered TIKA-1509 and TIKA-1558 -- te
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 7:03 AM
> To: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
>
> Unless there are objections, I'd lik
thy B. [mailto:talli...@mitre.org]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 7:03 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
Unless there are objections, I'd like these to be resolved before 1.8:
TIKA-1584 -- I'll fix
TIKA-1575 -- Resolved by Konstantin Gribov (thank you!)
TI
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Palsulich [mailto:tpalsul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 9:13 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
Once TIKA-1584 and TIKA-1575 are resolved, I'll work up an RC (unless
something else pops u
+1 for 1.8
> On 28 Mar 2015, at 15:01, Tyler Palsulich wrote:
>
> Should we release this as 1.8 or 1.7.1?
Once TIKA-1584 and TIKA-1575 are resolved, I'll work up an RC (unless
something else pops up).
Thank you everyone.
Tyler
On Mar 29, 2015 4:43 AM, "Hong-Thai Nguyen" wrote:
> +1 for 1.8
>
> Hong-Thai
>
> > On 28 Mar 2015, at 16:01, Tyler Palsulich wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Now that TIKA-
+1 for 1.8
Hong-Thai
> On 28 Mar 2015, at 16:01, Tyler Palsulich wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we need to
> release a new version of Tika. I'll volunteer to be the release manager
> again.
>
> Should we release this as 1.8 or 1.7.1?
>
, Computer Science Department
> >> > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> >> > ++
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> &
ofessor, Computer Science Department
>> > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> > ++++++++++++++++++
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> &
++
> > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> > ++
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tyler Palsulich
> > Reply
yler Palsulich
> Reply-To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
> Date: Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 8:01 AM
> To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
>
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we need to
&
if that's been fixed!
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 11:41 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
Hi Tyler - I would VOTE for 1.8. Given the stuff associated
with releasing (updating the website; sending emails; wai
uot;
Date: Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 8:01 AM
To: "dev@tika.apache.org"
Subject: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
>Hi Folks,
>
>Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we need to
>release a new version of Tika. I'll volunteer to be the release manager
>
ct: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we need to
> release a new version of Tika. I'll volunteer to be the release manager
> again.
>
> Should we release this as 1.8 or 1.7.1?
>
> Does an
Hi Folks,
Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we need to
release a new version of Tika. I'll volunteer to be the release manager
again.
Should we release this as 1.8 or 1.7.1?
Does anyone have any last minute issues they'd like to finish and see in
Tika 1.X? I'd like to
16 matches
Mail list logo
