[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison updated TIKA-2379:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.15.1)
1.16
> tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong imp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison updated TIKA-2379:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.15.1
> tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package which d
Late to the party...
Great work Tim!
Thank you for all your huge work with Tika!
Em 30 de mai de 2017 3:10 PM, "Tim Allison" <talli...@apache.org> escreveu:
> The Apache Tika project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Tika
> 1.15. The release contents have been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Paulin resolved TIKA-2379.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package which d
Logging bundles to the test as some of the Parsers do require
org.apache.commons.logging to run.
* Upgraded the OSGi spec, Felix runtime, and Pax Exam for the test runner.
Please review.
> tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package which does not
>
/src/test/resources/exam.properties
TIKA-2379 - Add test scope back in for JUnit. (bob:
[https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/c3cf30fa7de70b350b6344459cbb39410f24d438])
* (edit) tika-bundle/pom.xml
> tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package which does not
>
tree that
caused this. We can probably add a PaxExam test with a SLF4J 1.7 bundle to
ensure this works in future releases. Thanks for the heads up
[~talli...@mitre.org]
> tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package which does not
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Paulin reassigned TIKA-2379:
Assignee: Bob Paulin
> tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package which d
can we make sure this never happens again?
Looks like 1.15 is actually 1.16-rc1? :(
> tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package which does not
> exists
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison updated TIKA-2379:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package wh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claus Ibsen updated TIKA-2379:
--
Summary: tika-bundle 1.15 has wrong import of org.sfl4j.event package which
does not exists (was: tika
im Allison [mailto:talli...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 12:18 PM
> To: dev@tika.apache.org; u...@tika.apache.org; annou...@apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Tika 1.15 released
>
>
> The Apache Tika project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Tika
>
ika.apache.org; annou...@apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Tika 1.15 released
>
>
> The Apache Tika project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Tika
>
> 1.15. The release contents have been pushed out to the main Apache release
> site and to the
>
> Maven Ce
: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 12:18 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org; u...@tika.apache.org; annou...@apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Tika 1.15 released
The Apache Tika project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Tika
1.15. The release contents have been pushed out to the main Apache release
> Signature good but there is no trust on key, not a blocker but I think you
> have actually got your key signed by some third parties now, Tim. Have you
> managed to submit your signed key?
Sorry for my daftness...do you mean in the KEYS file in our repo? I just
updated that in trunk.
The Apache Tika project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Tika
1.15. The release contents have been pushed out to the main Apache release site
and to the
Maven Central sync, so the releases should be available as soon as the mirrors
get the syncs.
Apache Tika is a toolkit
: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 11:54 PM
To: u...@tika.apache.org; Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org>; dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tika 1.15 Candidate #2
+1 from me, SIGS and CHECKSUMS look great, thanks Tim!
LMC-053601:fo
+1 from me, SIGS and CHECKSUMS look great, thanks Tim!
LMC-053601:for prod in app server; do
> $HOME/bin/stage_apache_rc tika-$prod 1.15
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/
> done
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time
On 24 May 2017 at 02:22, Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.15.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this packag
Thanks, Tim.
Tika 1.15-rc2 builds fine on ArchLinux w/ openjdk 8u121 without
tesseract-ocr, grobid and other heavyweight external deps.
SHA1, MD5 and PGP signatures for tika-src, tika-app and tika-server are
correct.
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.15
[ ] -1 Do not release
@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Oleg Tikhonov
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 4:33 PM
> To: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tika 1.15 Candidate #1
>
> Also put
> ./tika-dl/src/test/java/org/apache/tika/dl/imagerec/
> DL4JInceptionV3NetTest.java
> @Ignore b
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.15
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 19:41 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2017-05-24T22:22:17
A second candidate for the Tika 1.15 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://github.com/apache/tika/tree/1.15-rc2/
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
e283468e47855f9142578c126e12f02eb5b08d2b
Hi Oleg,
What's your error on that unit test?
-Original Message-
From: olegtikho...@gmail.com [mailto:olegtikho...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Oleg
Tikhonov
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 4:33 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tika 1.15 Candidate #1
Also put
You're absolutely right. I was going by the lack of a release note on the
rc1 branch, but looking at the code the change is actually there.
Thanks!
Aeham
> tika-parent
> 1.16-SNAPSHOT
> tika-parent/pom.xml
>
>
>
> If you are cloning the project, the upper level pom contains this.
> The fix is to change 1.16-SNAPSHOT to 1.15
>
> What i did was:
> git clone https://github.com/apache/tika.git
>
>
Hi guys,
Here is wrong ...
org.apache.tika
tika-parent
1.16-SNAPSHOT
tika-parent/pom.xml
If you are cloning the project, the upper level pom contains this.
The fix is to change 1.16-SNAPSHOT to 1.15
What i did was:
git clone https://github.com/apache/tika.git
Any
From: Aeham Abushwashi [mailto:aeham.abushwa...@exonar.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 3:47 AM
To: u...@tika.apache.org; Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org>
Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tika 1.15 Candidate #1
Thanks Tim and apologies if this isn't the rig
Thanks Tim and apologies if this isn't the right thread to ask this
question... any reason TIKA-2300 is not included despite FixVersions=1.15
on the ticket?
On 22 May 2017 at 20:25, Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote:
> A candidate for the Tika 1.15 release is available at
Tika 1.15 Candidate #1
A candidate for the Tika 1.15 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://github.com/apache/tika/tree/1.15-rc1
The SHA1 checksum of the archive
A candidate for the Tika 1.15 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://github.com/apache/tika/tree/1.15-rc1
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
e82697a6804373367fbba98d47426ab74e036eb1.
In addition
://builds.apache.org/job/Tika-trunk/1273/])
TIKA-2373 -- fix licenses via rat in prep for 1.15 release (tallison:
[https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/b2fc478e99b9814fde747d8f8eef03e054fb4d25])
* (edit) tika-eval/src/main/resources/lucene-char-mapping.txt
* (edit) tika-parsers/src/main/java/org/apache/tika
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison resolved TIKA-2373.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.15
> Fix licenses via rat before 1.15 rele
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16019789#comment-16019789
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on TIKA-2373:
-
exclude away!
> Fix licenses via rat before 1
/src/test/resources/org/apache/tika/langdetect/*
tika-langdetect/src/test/resources/org/apache/tika/langdetect/language-tests/*
> Fix licenses via rat before 1.15 release
>
>
> Key: TIKA-2373
> URL: https://is
Tim Allison created TIKA-2373:
-
Summary: Fix licenses via rat before 1.15 release
Key: TIKA-2373
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2373
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Bug
n my mail client and the tika list.
If fellow devs are willing to put up with hand holding, I'd be happy to
have a go at release manager for 1.15.
Last I remember, Tyler had some detailed notes...anyone remember where
those are?
Thank you!
Best,
On Mon, 22 May 2017, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
Last I remember, Tyler had some detailed notes...anyone remember where
those are?
https://wiki.apache.org/tika/ReleaseProcess
Nick
I tried to send this offer over the weekend, but there was a failure somewhere
btwn my mail client and the tika list.
If fellow devs are willing to put up with hand holding, I'd be happy to have a
go at release manager for 1.15.
Last I remember, Tyler had some detailed notes...anyone remember
+1 Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 10:15 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
Hey Tim,
I am, Luis is, you are, that’s probably a good enough start. I’ll roll the RC
this afternoon, early AM
7, 2017 10:01 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
Tim, are we good for 1.15? Should I roll the RC?
Thanks!
On 5/17/17, 3:50 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote:
Full report on attachment # diffs:
, May 17, 2017 10:01 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
Tim, are we good for 1.15? Should I roll the RC?
Thanks!
On 5/17/17, 3:50 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote:
Full report on attachment # diffs:
http://162.242
Tim, are we good for 1.15? Should I roll the RC?
Thanks!
On 5/17/17, 3:50 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote:
Full report on attachment # diffs:
http://162.242.228.174/reports/attachment_diffs_complete_20170516.xlsx
Still need to look throug
Content looks reasonable to me. Once we resolve two issues with the
SentimentParser (TIKA-2360 and TIKA-2368), I think we're ready to roll with
1.15. Any concerns with the eval reports? Any other blockers on 1.15?
Content details:
We improved on "common words" metric Word 6
Subject: RE: Tika 1.15
I reran the eval with some updates, including rc1 of PDFBox 2.0.6, which is now
integrated.
http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_tika_20170515.tar.gz
I need to do some more digging on attachments -- hit max limit. The decrease
in attachments from the few docs I reviewed
by change in default
behavior of macro extraction -- in 1.14 we were extracting macros by default,
but we aren't doing this in 1.15. However, I want to look at more than the
first x diffs because there may be other file formats further down the results
that weren't included in the report.
I also want
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
Thanks for the link. It looks like the UI is written with Angular and uses
Elastic + static JSON. See
https://github.com/USCDataScience/polar-deep-insights/wiki/Architecture.
I also like d3. In general, I think we are on the same page the best option is
a web based UI.
I
he db that would allow you to visualize
> the reports/see the data and have links to the original (binary) files plus
> the extract files for both A and B (perhaps with a diff visualization).
>
> Three cheers for d3.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tyler B
[mailto:tpalsul...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 11:39 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tika 1.15
How exactly did you "evaluate" the results? I opened the zip and looked at
a few of the sheets, but it's a bit daunting.
Any way we could dump JSON? Th
the code, but, I agree, they are largely incomprehensible to someone getting
started.
So, please, help!
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Bui-Palsulich [mailto:tpalsul...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 11:39 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tika 1.15
How exactly did you
for d3.
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Bui-Palsulich [mailto:tpalsul...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 11:39 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tika 1.15
How exactly did you "evaluate" the results? I opened the zip and looked at a
few of the sheets, but it's a bi
> Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 4:57 PM
> To: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
>
> Thanks Tim. I am going to try and get tika-dl added (if possible), and
> also try the Sentiment Parser next. If I can get one or both of those (in
> the next day or so),
> wrote:
> Sounds good. W00t!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 4:57 PM
> To: dev@tika.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
>
> Thanks Tim. I am going to try and get tika-dl added (if possible
Sounds good. W00t!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2017 4:57 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
Thanks Tim. I am going to try and get tika-dl added (if possible), and also try
the Sentiment Parser next. If I can
Cheers,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 12:48 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 12:48 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
Thank you!
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010
Oh. Ok. Will wait, then?
-Original Message-
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 11:38 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
I want to see if I can get in the VideoRecognition parser, and also the
Senti
Oh. Ok. Will wait, then?
-Original Message-
From: Mattmann, Chris A (3010) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 11:38 AM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
I want to see if I can get in the VideoRecognition parser, and also the
Sentiment
I want to see if I can get in the VideoRecognition parser, and also the
Sentiment one.
I hope to get it done in the next day or so. Thanks.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative
With the added TSD parser, I think I should rerun the regression testing.
Given that, I also fixed 2099, and we'll benefit from a rerun.
Anything else before I rerun the regression testing?
Any problems observed in first run?
Reports for 1.14 v 1.15-SNAPSHOT are available here:
https://github.com/tballison/share/blob/master/tika_comparisons/reports_1_14V1_15.zip
I haven't looked at any of the reports yet.
The "Report" phase took 8 hours; I think because of paging. We've clearly hit
the limits of
Should be, y. Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Thamme Gowda [mailto:tgow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 4:43 PM
To: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tika 1.15
Tim,
Merged the InceptionV4 update PR to ObjectRecognitionParser.
Since this parser is not enabled by default
he regression runs,
> we can still add the updates there if desired before 1.15.
>
> Cheers,
>
>Tim
>
Unless there are blockers, I'll kick off the regression runs now. It may take
a few days to have results.
Given that don't test the ObjectRecognition code in the regression runs, we
can still add the updates there if desired before 1.15.
Cheers,
Tim
B. <talli...@mitre.org>:
> > >
> > > > All,
> > > > POI is voting on rc1 of the next release. Once that's released and
> > > > integrated into Tika, let's start the release process for Tika 1.15,
> > end
> > > of
>
k this weekend
> >
> > чт, 13 апр. 2017, 0:00 Allison, Timothy B. <talli...@mitre.org>:
> >
> > > All,
> > > POI is voting on rc1 of the next release. Once that's released and
> > > integrated into Tika, let's start the relea
is voting on rc1 of the next release. Once that's released and
> > integrated into Tika, let's start the release process for Tika 1.15, end
> of
> > next week, middle of following? Any blockers?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > --
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Gribov
>
Preliminary +1 from me, I'll the a closer look this weekend
чт, 13 апр. 2017, 0:00 Allison, Timothy B. <talli...@mitre.org>:
> All,
> POI is voting on rc1 of the next release. Once that's released and
> integrated into Tika, let's start the release process for Tika 1.15, end
g on rc1 of the next release. Once that's released and
integrated into Tika, let's start the release process for Tika 1.15, end of
next week, middle of following? Any blockers?
Cheers,
Tim
All,
POI is voting on rc1 of the next release. Once that's released and
integrated into Tika, let's start the release process for Tika 1.15, end of
next week, middle of following? Any blockers?
Cheers,
Tim
None, and happy to roll one by early-mid next week…
On 3/17/17, 3:23 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <talli...@mitre.org> wrote:
All,
We're coming up on 6 months since our last release. Any objections to
releasing Tika 1.15 shortly after POI 3.16-beta3 is out (early/mid A
All,
We're coming up on 6 months since our last release. Any objections to
releasing Tika 1.15 shortly after POI 3.16-beta3 is out (early/mid April, I'd
guess)?
Cheers,
Tim
72 matches
Mail list logo
