Re: Extended fix for TIKA-1169

2014-05-16 Thread Ken Krugler
Hi Matthias, A new issue would be great, as that's what we use to tag changes in SVN. Also a test case (a .jnilib binary that currently fails) would be good. -- Ken On May 15, 2014, at 12:55pm, Matthias Krueger wrote: > I came across some other .jnilib binaries which were detected as .class

Extended fix for TIKA-1169

2014-05-16 Thread Matthias Krueger
I came across some other .jnilib binaries which were detected as .class files and caused issues. It seems there are more Mach-o binary magic variants depending on 32/64 Bit architecture and endianness. Fix is attached. Let me know if I should rather clone the closed TIKA-1169 and attach it th