Re: PUT vs. POST in tika-server

Am 05.04.2012 um 10:29 schrieb Jukka Zitting: Hi all, > IMO a more appropriate verb to use is POST, that's meant (among other > things) for: +1, I'd also prefer to have POST, also as the default. best Ingo -- Ingo Renner TYPO3 Core Developer, Release Manager TYPO3 4.2, Admin Google Summer o

Re: PUT vs. POST in tika-server

Hi Guys, Yeah, I am happy to annotate the code with @POST too like Max suggested. I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-891 to track this. Thanks! Cheers, Chris On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > I notice the tika-server component (nice work documenting

Re: PUT vs. POST in tika-server

Hello! 05.04.2012 12:29, Jukka Zitting написал: I notice the tika-server component (nice work documenting and setting it up, btw!) uses the PUT verb for receiving documents to be parsed. IMO a more appropriate verb to use is POST, that's meant (among other things) for: "Providing a block o

PUT vs. POST in tika-server

Hi, I notice the tika-server component (nice work documenting and setting it up, btw!) uses the PUT verb for receiving documents to be parsed. The HTTP spec says the following about PUT: "The PUT method requests that the enclosed entity be stored under the supplied Request-URI." IMO a more