Re: Possible re-opening of resolved issue TIKA-738?

2011-11-26 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Thanks, Mike, appreciate it. Cheers, Chris On Nov 26, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I agree, makes sense. > > I'll go re-close TIKA-738, and commit my patch / CHANGES entry under > the already opened TIKA-778... > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandles

Re: Possible re-opening of resolved issue TIKA-738?

2011-11-26 Thread Michael McCandless
Hi Chris, I agree, makes sense. I'll go re-close TIKA-738, and commit my patch / CHANGES entry under the already opened TIKA-778... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Just an FYI my personal preferenc

Re: Possible re-opening of resolved issue TIKA-738?

2011-11-26 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hey Guys, Just an FYI my personal preference on things like this are to leave the original issue closed, open up a new issue and to link back to the original one. This is mainly from a release management perspective, where we may have already shipped a CHANGES.txt with a closed issue that gets re

Re: Possible re-opening of resolved issue TIKA-738?

2011-11-26 Thread Michael McCandless
Yes please go ahead and reopen TIKA-738... sounds like something is wrong! Thanks. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:25 PM, John M wrote: > Hello, > > When I use the latest build of the Tika application jar's CLI with the > -h option to parse testAnnotati

Possible re-opening of resolved issue TIKA-738?

2011-11-25 Thread John M
Hello, When I use the latest build of the Tika application jar's CLI with the -h option to parse testAnnotations.pdf (from the parsers' test documents folder), added in TIKA-738, the result has two "" elements and three "" elements. Attempting to open this file in the GUI also causes it to crash