[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17466817#comment-17466817 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-3488: -- arend-von-reinersdorff commented on pull request #468: URL:

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17466681#comment-17466681 ] Lewis John McGibbney commented on TIKA-3488: This was fixed in

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17466679#comment-17466679 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-3488: -- lewismc closed pull request #468: URL:

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17466678#comment-17466678 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-3488: -- lewismc commented on pull request #468: URL:

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17465474#comment-17465474 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-3488: -- arend-von-reinersdorff opened a new pull request #468: URL:

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17455265#comment-17455265 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3488: --- Updated version of jdom2 is now available. :) > Security issue XXE

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17447675#comment-17447675 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-3488: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-main-jdk8 #366 (See

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17406822#comment-17406822 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-3488: -- FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika » tika-main-jdk8 #322 (See

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17406783#comment-17406783 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3488: --- This is wrong. Even if you build a standard w3c DOM/Document, rome

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17406769#comment-17406769 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3488: --- Turns out we can exclude jdom2 for Rome and just build a standard

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17388050#comment-17388050 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3488: --- I dug a bit more into rome which we just updated, and they are now

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-3488) Security issue XXE in TIKA due to JDOM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17388047#comment-17388047 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-3488: --- We appear to use jdom2 in two parsers: rome (FeedParser) and ucar.