THausherr merged PR #1725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/1725
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1725:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/1725
Bumps `scm.version` from 2.0.1 to 2.1.0.
Updates `org.apache.maven.scm:maven-scm-provider-gitexe` from 2.0.1 to 2.1.0
Updates `org.apache.maven.scm:maven-scm-api` from 2.0.1 to 2.1.0
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/576#issuecomment-1135350685
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when
a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next
major or minor version, let me
THausherr closed pull request #576: Bump stax-ex from 2.0.1 to 2.1.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/576
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment
THausherr commented on PR #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/576#issuecomment-1135026565
It works with jdk8 too... so the proposed change would be
```
org.jvnet.staxex
stax-ex
2.1.0
THausherr commented on PR #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/576#issuecomment-1135006054
That didn't work; what did work for jdk18 was to exclude
jakarta.activation-api from stax-ex. I'll test a jdk8 build.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
THausherr commented on PR #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/576#issuecomment-1134969962
This one still fails with jdk18, in Apache Tika natural language process
module.
```
Dependency convergence error for
jakarta.activation:jakarta.activation-api:1.2.2 paths to
THausherr commented on PR #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/576#issuecomment-1134958582
@dependabot rebase
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #576:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tika/pull/576
Bumps [stax-ex](https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxb-stax-ex) from 2.0.1 to
2.1.0.
Commits
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxb-stax-ex/commit/8eeacab7bd1cdd36984f3880fa121058d481a732
://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/306/])
TIKA-3502 -- general upgrades for the next 2.x version. (tallison:
[https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/9e02bbfe3234bc8d31e4f20fe195ada54163514b])
* (edit) tika-parent/pom.xml
> General upgrades for 2.
://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/302/])
TIKA-3502 -- general upgrades for 2.0.1 (tallison:
[https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/e8ea70a482c9acc4aa0c40a2e17f6ee360e79060])
* (edit) tika-parent/pom.xml
> General upgrades for 2.
://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/294/])
TIKA-3502 general upgrades for 2.0.1 (tallison:
[https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/bb0fbe6399abeb0a8bb9752b5f9f392b8c81c44e])
* (edit) tika-core/pom.xml
* (edit) tika-bundles/tika-bundle-standard/pom.xml
* (edit) tika-parent/pom.xml
osed?
> 2. Same for 1.28?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TIKA/versions/12350455
> 3. 2.0.1 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TIKA/versions/12350410)
> looks like there are 11 issues done and 3 in progress. In all honesty, I'm
> not sure that these 3 issues are actua
/12350455
3. 2.0.1 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TIKA/versions/12350410) looks
like there are 11 issues done and 3 in progress. In all honesty, I'm not sure
that these 3 issues are actually in progress at all.
Look forward to 2.0.1...
Thanks
Lewis
On 2021/07/26 21:02:44, Tim Allison
://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tika/job/tika-main-jdk8/293/])
TIKA-3502: update commons-io and spring (tilman:
[https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/9a6dbed5a623eebb7bec295d3a57252f6c958e79])
* (edit) tika-parent/pom.xml
> General upgrades for 2.
/cc031e034a5169a5ccc50c4497573bd14e0b9773])
* (edit) tika-example/pom.xml
> General upgrades for 2.0.1
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-3502
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3502
> Project: Tika
>
Tim Allison created TIKA-3502:
-
Summary: General upgrades for 2.0.1
Key: TIKA-3502
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-3502
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Tim
made some important cleanups and updated some vulnerable
> > dependencies recently. Should we aim for August 2 or so to start the
> > next release process for 2.0.1 (or 2.1.0?)?
> >Thank you!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >Tim
>
>
>
o to start the
next release process for 2.0.1 (or 2.1.0?)?
Thank you!
Cheers,
Tim
All,
We've made some important cleanups and updated some vulnerable
dependencies recently. Should we aim for August 2 or so to start the
next release process for 2.0.1 (or 2.1.0?)?
Thank you!
Cheers,
Tim
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Gribov closed TIKA-1959.
---
> Upgrade to PDFBox 2.0.1/JempBox 1.8
-2.x/90/])
TIKA-1959 -- upgrade to PDFBox 2.0.1/JempBox 1.8.12 (tallison: rev
403db962294b2202d327a04511195ba84d33ed0a)
* tika-parser-modules/pom.xml
* CHANGES.txt
> Upgrade to PDFBox 2.0.1/JempBox 1.8.12
> --
>
> Ke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison updated TIKA-1959:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.0
> Upgrade to PDFBox 2.0.1/JempBox 1.8
with incorrect commit message...argh.
Performed separate regression test on 300k PDFs 2.0.0 vs. 2.0.1. No problems
found.
was (Author: talli...@mitre.org):
Committed with incorrect commit message...argh.
> Upgrade to PDFBox 2.0.1/JempBox 1.8
.
> Upgrade to PDFBox 2.0.1/JempBox 1.8.12
> --
>
> Key: TIKA-1959
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1959
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Tim Allis
Tim Allison created TIKA-1959:
-
Summary: Upgrade to PDFBox 2.0.1/JempBox 1.8.12
Key: TIKA-1959
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1959
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Improvement
26 matches
Mail list logo
