Mick, I modified the report just a bit to provide some extra
information and committed it to the board agenda, along with the chair
change resolution. I'm pasting the revised report below.
Thanks,
Greg
-
Apache Tiles is a free open-sourced templating framework for modern Java
applications. B
Hi Board,
I just committed a resolution to change the Apache Tiles PMC Chair. I
apologize if it was not appropriate to commit this directly. Also, the
project did not hold a formal vote for the change, but an informal
discussion on the dev@ list. I changed the resolution text to note
that. If any
No worries. I usually just put these together and post them without
feedback. But I was away this time as well :-) I'll assume the board
will accept it until I hear otherwise.
Greg
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>> I went ahead and submitted the following report just
airs would tend to keep
the development community small, and slow, but still present and active.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> It was due Wednesday 6/11. The meeting is not until this coming
> Wednesday 6/18, so if I can get something in today it might still be
>
It was due Wednesday 6/11. The meeting is not until this coming
Wednesday 6/18, so if I can get something in today it might still be
in time.
For a long time I never missed a report. Over the last couple of years
I've missed several and I don't like that record :-)
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 2:37 AM
Hi all,
Our June board report is due, but I have not had time to write it. Can
someone please write up the details of the recent release (and it
seems maybe there's been another release since March?) and anything
else you can think of based on previous reports? If you'll send it
back to the list I
As committed to the board agenda:
Apache Tiles is a templating framework for modern Java applications.
General:
This has been a very slow quarter for Apache Tiles. There have not been any
software releases or PMC changes in this quarter. There have been a few threads
on the user@ mailing list, b
As committed to svn...
Apache Tiles is a templating framework for modern Java applications. Based upon
the Composite pattern it is built to simplify the development of user
interfaces.
This quarter has shown a dramatic spike in activity on the Tiles User
mailing list.
That activity has spurred us
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA.
Greg
Hi Mick,
I'll try to take a look at this today and offer my vote.
Thanks,
Greg
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> ClamAV 0.96.5
>
>
>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
>> a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality:
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA
Greg
As committed to the Board agenda in Subversion:
General:
Apache Tiles is a templating framework built to simplify the
development of web application user interfaces.
Tiles continues to be one of those projects with very little development
activity but a decent-sized user base. There does not see
Thanks, Nicolas.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since it is a urgent security matter, I've completed the task and I'm
> asking for approval of the PMC after the deed. Thanks for your
> understanding.
>
> I applied the patch provided by Oracle and published
Ah. Thanks for that.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:19 AM, Mck wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 10:51 -0500, Greg Reddin wrote:
> > Questions continue to trickle into the users list
> > and they generally get responses within a day or two.
>
> there's also a lot more u
General:
Apache Tiles is a templating framework built to simplify the development of
web
application user interfaces.
Once again, the Tiles community has stepped up and shown some signs of life
just when I was ready to call it done. This quarter has shown some continued
activity around releases.
+1 GA
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Mck wrote:
> > Subject: [VOTE] tiles-master-5 test Release Quality
>^^ subject line shouldn't have "test" in it.
>
>
> > If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> > a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
>
+1 Beta
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
> +1 Beta
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Mck wrote:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [X] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> >
> > ~mck
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Wars of nations are fought to change
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Mck wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 16:40 -0500, Greg Reddin wrote:
> > What do you guys think? Should we try to re-kickstart the project or
> > retire it?
>
> I have a backlog of work around velocity and mustache that will result
>
Apache Tiles is a templating framework built to simplify the development of
web
application user interfaces.
The Tiles project had an extremely slow quarter with no community changes
and
no releases. Mailing list activity was at a trickle until the very end of
the
period. At that time a few user-r
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I've opened a few issues in our JIRA (with blocker priority) to migrate
> our projects to svnpubsub.
>
> Since there's a maven plugin for svnpubsub, and our whole web site is
> generated from maven, the migration should be strai
g Apache's native git support up
to speed so we may not be able to rely on them to help us out at the
last minute. So... I plan to do some more research and propose a way
forward in the next couple of weeks. Let me know if you have any
thoughts.
Greg
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Greg Redd
Sorry folks, I've been way behind on the Tiles list lately and haven't
had time to check the releases. You have enough PMC votes to release
without me so don't feel obligated to wait. I'm not sure when I'll
have time available to check on these.
Greg
Looks like a good plan. Thanks for all your work!
Greg
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A quick sum up of the current situation:
>
> * Beta testing
> A few issues have been found since the release of Tiles 3.0.0 and
> associated projects. Most significant are:
>
As committed to the board agenda in svn.
Apache Tiles is a templating framework built to simplify the development of web
application user interfaces.
Releases:
We released version 3.0.0 of the Tiles Framework as Beta quality.
Along with this
release we split out the autotag and request frame
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>> Mck, would you be willing to change your vote to Beta so we'd have
>> full consensus? Or do you feel strongly that these should be GA?
>
> Absolutely. I was unsure how things worked here, my guess was that
> consensus fell upon the lowest
This is really good stuff. Thanks for taking the initiative to get it going...
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> We have the 3 bindings votes to release it
> and will probably have a consensus on Beta Quality. I'll try and complete
> the release process this week or next.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [X] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
I'm sorry, I'm changing my vote to Beta. I should
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
I could go GA, but I think it's a good idea to call this one beta for
now and promote it later if it passes muster.
Greg
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
I'd be willing to go GA, but the source dist is not really buildable
until the autotag release is available. Sure you can download the test
build, but let's
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> On the other hand, I'm not sure how the peer review happens; commit messages
> allow people to check the contents of each page by reading the apt pages,
Yeah, peer review is really on the source code.
I haven't mentioned anything yet and
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> There is a complete tiles-3.0.0 bundle and a tiles-request-1.0.0 bundle for
> people who do not want the full tiles (it helps demonstrate that
> tiles-request can be used without tiles). There is no bundle for autotag;
> since it is a maven
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA
For future releases, does it make sense to have a tarball source
distribution? I don't mind it being distributed primarily via the
Maven repository,
Sorry, my time has not been available. I will get to this soon, hopefully.
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> I'm going to try to look at these releases on Monday and vote on them.
>
> Greg
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> - the web site of the released version available at
> http://tiles.apache.org/framework, http://tiles.apache.org/tiles-autotag,
> http://tiles.apache.org/tiles-request.
This one is tricky. I'm not sure if we should push these out to the
sit
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
> That's correct, as long as we don't collide with apache's distaste of
> umbrella projects. ref
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.tiles.devel/180/focus=182
Sorry, I haven't had time to follow this closely. But I wanted to make
a
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> See:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
>
> In other words, no creativity means no need for a license header. I doubt
> there is creativity in an auto-generated source file.
Common sense tells me this is true. Of
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> I'm not sure if a vote is required for this artefact alone, since it is a
> very technical and internal concern. Its release is necessary however prior
> to any release of Tiles-3, in order to get rid of references to snapshots.
Yes we do
On behalf of the Apache Tiles PMC I'd like to welcome our newest PMC
member Nicolas LE BAS. Nicolas has been a committer for some time and
now has full voting rights on the release he has been working hard on
:-)
Welcome, Nicolas!
Greg
(as committed to the March board agenda)
Apache Tiles is a templating framework built to simplify the development of web
application user interfaces.
The Tiles PMC is in the middle of a slow, but steady reconstitution. This
quarter, like most quarters, has been characterized by slow progress. Th
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Let me know if this disagrees with anyone.
Cool, I like it :-)
Greg
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> [For the 20-line patch/new class that started all this... an iCLA from
> the author and an attachment in JIRA with the checkbox would be the
> quickest way to get it accepted while you sort out how pull requests
> should be handled.]
I was goi
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> There's no hurry on this Greg. What's actually the proper mailing list
> to ask this? infrastructure or irc?
Probably infra. I wish I had time to run it down myself, but if you
want it done anytime soon I'd probably suggest contacting infr
Hi,
I think it's great that Morten is contributing this and I'd like to
see it get in. We need to make sure of the provenance of it though. I
think he should attach the patch to Jira so we can have a legal
reference of his contribution.
Greg
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Nicolas Le Bas (Cre
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Currently comments in tile's jira are just plain text.
> Can we change this to allow the wiki markup?
>
> http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/Configuring+Renderers
I suspect it can be done. I'm not sure if the ASF Jira instance ha
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
> Thanks for identifying this issue, but for some reason the attachement
> didn't come through to the list. Could you maybe open a JIRA issue for it:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TILES
I'm pretty sure the list strips attachments.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> Hello
> just to be clear, sorry if I seemed rude.
I didn't catch any rudeness. I've gotten used to your style over the years :-)
Greg
+1. I like the idea of API cleanup, which it seems like this does.
Greg
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:19 PM, mck wrote:
> Can we remove/rename util packages...
>
> I'd be more comfortable seeing the Util classes treated as peer classes
> residing in the packages where are primarily used (and ofc then
As committed to the December board agenda:
Apache Tiles is a templating framework built to simplify the development of
web application user interfaces.
We added one new committer this quarter: Nicolas LE BAS. We are hoping that a
beta release of Tiles 3 (the next revolutionary version of Tiles)
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> Does these steps have a meaning? Why Tiles should still be an Apache
> project, when Nicolas and Mick successfully used Git (and GitHub) to fork
> and provide a patch?
> Isn't a better thing to move Tiles to the attic and create a new proj
Hi all,
I just wanted to get our thoughts out in the open about where we see
Apache Tiles going.
I think Antonio has already announced his intentions to eventually go
emeritus. At some point I'd like to do the same, although I'm willing
to stick around as long as I need to. I guess we're essentia
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:05 AM, mck wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 13:47 -0500, Nicolas LE BAS wrote:
>>
>> But I agree with Greg that those shouldn't stop the release of
>> 1.0-beta.
>
> api breaking changes, particularly to tiles-request, tiles-autotag,
> should be stabilised before i release i
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:16 AM, mck wrote:
> finn.no last thursday came out with an upgrade to tiles-3.
Congratulations, that's a nice site - even though I couldn't read any of it :-)
> This puts us in a position where we'd like to push towards a beta
> release of tiles-3. Nicolas: have you more
The Apache Tiles PMC is proud to introduce our newest committer: Nicolas LE BAS.
Welcome aboard Nicolas. Thank you for your contributions!
I'll get your commit privileges set up asap.
Thanks,
Greg Reddin
Nicolas,
I've been trying to contact you off-list. Did you get my email? If you
haven't had a chance to respond yet, that's fine. I just wanted to
make sure you got the email.
If you didn't get it is there a better address that I can use to
contact you? Feel free to email me privately if you like
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
>
> Anything that improves Tiles is welcome :-D Go on.
+1
Greg
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Mck wrote:
> The traffic to these lists are quite small.
> Would it make sense to merge them together (by sending issue mails to
> dev@tiles.apache.org)?
> I find following these lists, for all practical purposes, largely one
> and the same.
>
> I'm presuming this
As checked in to the board agenda...
Apache Tiles is a Java EE templating framework built to simplify the
development
of web application user interfaces.
Community:
It's been an interesting quarter for the Tiles project. I fully expected to come
to this report with a resolution to move Tiles to t
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
>
> The right URL is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/site/doap_Tiles.rdf
Thanks, that's correct.
> About MIck, can a freshly-elected PMC member be a PMC chair? If yes, I have
> no objections for him.
There's nothing wrong with th
It's time for our September board report. I expected to either submit
a resolution to move the project to the attic or change the PMC chair.
Instead, it seems there is still interest and we've added a new PMC
member.
To finish up the implementation of the trademark guidelines I checked
in a DOAP f
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> AFAIK subprojects' names are not trademarkable. The trademark is only on
> Tiles itself.
I'm pretty sure that's correct.
Greg
Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> 2011/6/30 Antonio Petrelli
>
>> 2011/6/29 Greg Reddin
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Antonio Petrelli
>>> wrote:
>>> > 2011/6/29 Greg Reddin
>>> >> Tha
This is really two threads in one, but I see no reason to split up two
sentences into two threads :-)
1) What's tiles-test-sandbox for? The pom.xml calls it
tiles-test-reactor, but it's not included in the module list for the
main tiles-reactor pom.
2) As far as the "umbrella" nature of things I
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:30 PM, mck wrote:
> Sorry Greg i actually forgot you did this...
> As i did the same thing and created a TILES_2_3_X branch.
> I'll delete it as you're correct in that it is a continuation of the
> 2_2_x code.
I noticed that. No worries. I suspect the 2_3 branch and 2_2
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> 2011/6/29 Greg Reddin
>> That's what I thought too, but it seems that we have a broken link on
>> the download site.
>>
>
> What broken link? They all seem fine:
> http://tiles.apache.org/download.htm
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> v2 is the release of tiles-master, it has no meaning to distribute it (its
> meaning is only for Maven users). So I deleted it.
> Putting back v2.1.4 may not be necessary, v2.2.2 has been declared GA so
> there is no need to add another pr
Forwarded message --
From: Mark Thomas
Date: Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:19 PM
Subject: Re: Tiles and /dist WAS: infra report for the board
To: Greg Reddin
Cc: infrastructure-priv...@apache.org, Apache Infrastructure
On 13/06/2011 23:13, Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:05 PM,
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:45 AM, mck wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:18 -0500, Greg Reddin wrote:
>> Ok, I misunderstood. Let me look at it again. Right now I'm leaning
>> toward "tiles-reactor", but let me check it again.
>
> Time's up Greg :-)
> For
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
>> tiles-parent is already taken by the tiles3 submodule.
>>
>> If we rename the parent we are backtracking its versioning history.
>> It's currently at 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT but tiles-sandbox is currently at
>> 1.0-SNAPSHOT.
>>
>
> With Tiles 3, i
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> Also "tiles-sandbox" will need to be renamed, but to what?
>> "tiles-reactor"?
>>
>
> I'm not good at names :-) tiles-parent was good when on Tiles needed to be
> built. I don't know what's best here. Probably "tiles-reactor" is good, or
>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Mck wrote:
>> +1: let's promote them!
>> +0: tend to agree on the promotion, but had no chance to review the
>> projects deeply;
>> -0: tend to disagree on the promotion,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Mck wrote:
> +1: let's promote them!
> +0: tend to agree on the promotion, but had no chance to review the
> projects deeply;
> -0: tend to disagree on the promotion, but won't veto it;
> -1: don't promote them (please explain why).
+1.
When Antonio originally po
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> Great news! Obviously I'm still willing to test the builds.
+1 Same here.
Greg
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:10 PM, mck wrote:
> Antonio,
> are you interested in finding a new name for Tiles-3 and setting it up
> on Google code?
> Then the existing Tiles-2 project can be left in the Attic as-is.
I'm sorry, I don't think I've been clear. As of right now, there's no
reason to d
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> IBATIS moved to the attic and the original team had to rename it "MyBatis".
That was a little different situation though because several of the
PMC members simply decided unilaterally to leave the ASF. My
understanding is that the ASF, a
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Mck wrote:
> My biggest upset here is not getting Tiles-3 out. I would be eager and
> can commit in participating in getting this out the door. After that I
> would be more happy to attic the project (or move it to Spring if
> they'll have us).
Tiles 3 can still b
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> I must admit that I was not active at all.
> Sincerely I was pretty tired of being the only developer, so I decided to
> find fun somewhere else (GWT and Android).
I figured that was the case and I don't blame you. In some ways I feel
li
In January I reported that the Tiles community has been inactive long
enough that it may be time to make a change. In discussions on the
dev@ list some committers indicated that they had plans to do some
revolutionary work that would be starting in the next few months. We
agreed to give the project
Hi Wendy :-)
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> Same reason any corporate entity would patch it and do an internal
> release. They need it fixed _now_, not when the volunteer labor force
> at Apache gets around to accepting the patch and doing a release. :)
> It's just that th
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> I think we need to wait a bit (half a year, probably?) to decide to
> move Tiles. Mick has great plans for Tiles :-)
Agreed.
> Good question. Take a look at this issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TILES-404
> It is clear that
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:03 PM, mck wrote:
> While it seems obvious that Tiles is stablised/stablising as a product,
> i don't see the point in all the work in migrating it to another place
> just because the commit rate is dropping...
I've had that thought as well. If we're having trouble build
Hi guys,
It's time for the December Tiles board report. Honestly, unless I've
forgotten something, there's really not much to report. Mck's
article/blog post is about the only news that happened this month. I
think it's time for us to do a little navel-gazing and see where the
project is headed.
Forwarded message from Nick Burch:
Hi All
Just a reminder that our next Apache Retreat will be in Hursley in the
UK, from the 17th - 19th September. That's a little over a month away
now!
If you're an Apache Committer, we'd like to invite you to come for the
whole weekend. We've
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> If you have had a chance to review the sanboxed projects, please respond with
> a vote on their promotion in the following way:
>
> +1: let's promote them!
> +0: tend to agree on the promotion, but had no chance to review the
> projects dee
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> The Tiles 3 project will be moved to /framework/trunk, the 2.2.x
> branch will be created to preserve future releases.
> The request microframework will be moved to /request/trunk and Autotag
> to /autotag/trunk.
>
> What do you think? I w
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA.
Greg
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> The Tiles 2.2.2 test build has been available since 17th June 2010.
Sorry, once again I'm the holdup. I'll try to have a look at this today.
Thanks,
Greg
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> I just noticed that the docs distribution does not contain any doc,
> just the notice and the license!
> This evening (CET) I will upload the correct docs zip. The binary and
> source packages seem to be OK.
Do you have any idea what happ
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA
Greg
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> Do you think I can start the release process? I will do tiles-master
> version 3 and tiles-parent version 2.2.2 in this order.
I don't see any reason to wait.
Greg
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> [X] +1 Agree
> [ ] +0 Indifferent, but do not disagree
> [ ] -0 Disagree, but not sure why
> [ ] -1 Do not agree, leave release procedure as-is
Greg
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> [X] +1 Agree
> [ ] +0 Indifferent, but do not disagree
> [ ] -0 Disagree, but not sure why
> [ ] -1 Do not agree, leave release procedure as-is
Greg
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
>
> P.S. Thanks go to Wes Wannemacher, because 99% of this message is his :-D
Including the subject... :-)
Greg
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
>> Nexus is a Maven repository manager, just like Archiva or Artifactory,
>> built by Sonatype and used at Apache as the main repository manager by
>> most projects.
>> The nicest feature I like is the staging facility, that allows
>> promot
I have very little idea of what Nexus is. Can you give a brief
overview of what it is and why it's beneficial?
Thanks,
Greg
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> Hi all
> I think it's time to migrate the Maven repository used by Tiles to the
> Nexus professional instance @Ap
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Gav..."
To:
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 09:25:39 +1000
Subject: [Travel Assistance] - Applications Open for ApacheCon NA 2010
Hi PMC's
Please distribute this notice to your user and dev lists:
The Travel Assistance Committee is now taking in application
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Mck wrote:
>
>
> The Tiles-master 2 test build has been available since 06/05/10.
+1 GA.
Greg
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> I am sorry, just now I realized the sillyness of my request: the
> "tiles" directory has been created by someone above us, so the
> tiles-master directly cannot be created by us.
> I really don't know what I was thinking and I apologize for
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Mck wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 11:43 +0200, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> BTW, the URL should have "/builds/tiles-master/ and not
>> "/builds/tiles/".
>
> I don't have permissions to create
> /people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/builds/tiles-master
Hmm, well,
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Antonio Petrelli
wrote:
> In what sense? The pom (without modules) is not released as an
> archive, but only inside Maven repository, and it has only the pom.xml
> itself (along with metadata and signatures), nothing more.
It's a released artifact because it's hous
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
