Re: [DISCUSS] Code Review TINKERPOP-1278: gremlin-python

Hey GitHub, think you all hip and cool with your ‘social coding’-vibe. Making up fun little tag lines so the kids these days think they are part of something bigger. Changing the world are ya? How boutz you take this fatty rebase to yo face, you punk ass version control. Marko. > On Aug 26,

Re: [DISCUSS] Code Review TINKERPOP-1278: gremlin-python

Merged TINKERPOP-1287 back to master and with that commit we bust past 1 commits! On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > I was taking a look at the various parts and reading the docs, which as > usual were very comprehensive. Really impressive work guys.

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1418) CoreTraversalTests depend on missing functionality

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439943#comment-15439943 ] stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1418: - i stared at the commit you referenced for a

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #390: GraphSON 2.0 Deser tweaks and improvements

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/390 I think I understand the Tree issue better (not the solution, just the context of the PR). Merged the second commit as well. Made note of the limitation to deal with later. --- If your

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1285) Gremline console does not differentiate between multi-line and single-line input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439923#comment-15439923 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1285: --- Github user spmallette commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #385: TINKERPOP-1285 added multi-line line number support

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/385 feel free to move ahead with the rebase and i can then get this merged. I think that the zeros can go now that we have the dots which i like the more each time i see it. thanks - this was a

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1285) Gremline console does not differentiate between multi-line and single-line input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439899#comment-15439899 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1285: --- Github user robertdale commented on the issue:

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #385: TINKERPOP-1285 added multi-line line number support

Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/385 @spmallette I can rebase on latest master. Just let me know. Do you think there is any point in keeping the leading zeroes? ``` gremlin> 1+ ..1> 2+ ..2> 3+ ..3>

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #390: GraphSON 2.0 Deser tweaks and improvements

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/390 i merged the first of these two commits via cherry pick. let's sit on the other one for a bit. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1037) Gremlin shell output coloring

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1037. --- Resolution: Done Assignee: stephen mallette Fix Version/s: 3.2.2

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1037) Gremlin shell output coloring

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439751#comment-15439751 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1037: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #384: TINKERPOP-1037 Made life more colorful

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/384 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [DISCUSS] Code Review TINKERPOP-1278: gremlin-python

I was taking a look at the various parts and reading the docs, which as usual were very comprehensive. Really impressive work guys. I think your plan is a good one Stephen so +1 from me. --Ted On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > There hasn't been

Re: [DISCUSS] Code Review TINKERPOP-1278: gremlin-python

There hasn't been much discussion here, so I'm assuming that there are no major objections to the work on TINKERPOP-1278. We've been generally discussing its ongoing development here on this list for a while now so I would think that everyone is up to speed on what's happening. I plan to get this