Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/402
nice @robertdale - merged via CTR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/402
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15488789#comment-15488789
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1441:
---
Yea, its unpredicatble in the sense
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15488643#comment-15488643
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1442:
---
GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:
GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/412
TINKERPOP-1442 Improved session cleanup on client close [tp31]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1442
While not a perfect implementation, a long run job blocking a close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1445:
Component/s: process
> Large nested VertexProperties and Properties do not get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15488590#comment-15488590
]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-1441:
---
Right, it's been like that in 3.1. Maybe we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15488435#comment-15488435
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1442:
-
Tried several different approaches to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15488441#comment-15488441
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1441:
---
Hm. Do you know what the result of this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15488103#comment-15488103
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1444:
---
Just realized that caching is only good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487629#comment-15487629
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1280:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487470#comment-15487470
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1369:
---
Github user okram commented on the issue:
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/399
I think is smart. This way all those REST evangelists won't get all uppity.
Its funny how REST people are like Ruby/Clojure/Hadoop people -- "bro,
insider tip --- its all about REST. Solves
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487459#comment-15487459
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1280:
---
Github user okram commented on the issue:
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/404
Very well done code. In other words, in full arrogance and conceit, this is
exactly how I would have done it thus, you work is perfect.
And like me, I would have skimped on the JavaDoc. Can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1440.
-
Resolution: Resolved
> g:Path needs a GraphSON deserializer in Gremlin-Python
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1447:
-
Summary: Add some JavaScript intelligence to the documentation so
that comments and output are not copied in a copy paste
Key: TINKERPOP-1447
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487373#comment-15487373
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1391:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/406
Right, this one was cherry-picked. But now, after a reset, a merge and a
forced push, the commit hashes are still different.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487329#comment-15487329
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1389:
---
This branch is now ready for testing on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487275#comment-15487275
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1430:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/410
Merged via CTR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487273#comment-15487273
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1440:
---
Github user davebshow commented on the issue:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/410
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davebshow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/408
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487237#comment-15487237
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1430:
---
Github user szarnyasg closed the pull request
Github user szarnyasg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/409
Changing the base branch did not work as I expected -- I opened a separate
PR instead.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/406
It looks like the code for this is the same as in the PR for tp31, but the
commit hashes are different. is this one of those cherry-pick situations you
were referencing in hipchat? I suspect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487204#comment-15487204
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1391:
---
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/402
@robertdale this is a bug in the 3.1.x docs too - could you retarget to the
tp31 branch for me please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Kevin Gallardo created TINKERPOP-1445:
-
Summary: Large nested VertexProperties and Properties do not get
printed well
Key: TINKERPOP-1445
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1445
GitHub user szarnyasg opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/409
Added note on Grape configuration for Gremlin-Neo4j
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/szarnyasg/tinkerpop master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15487105#comment-15487105
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1430:
---
Github user szarnyasg closed the pull request
Github user szarnyasg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/400
Closed: not a real issue, refer to the docs in
http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#gremlin-applications.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user szarnyasg closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/400
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
As there have been no objections, we will go with the PR per branch model
when we open the tp32 branch this coming weekend. The flow is pretty
simple. Let's say you have work for tp32:
1. git checkout -b tp32
2. do a bunch of stuff and commit in there
3. git checkout -b master
4. git merge
36 matches
Mail list logo
