On 18 January 2017 at 03:35, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
>
> *Question*: Can OrientDB do a “distributed transaction”? That is, if you
> have X number of connections to OrientDB, can you say that you want all
> connections to be tied to a single TX?
>
OrientDB can do distributed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15829168#comment-15829168
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1248:
---
Github user okram commented on the issue:
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/538
```
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/539
Whoa. Because I branched from `master/` the rebase looked insane
nevermind. I will twiddle to `tp32/` upon merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15829104#comment-15829104
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1606:
---
Github user okram commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15829102#comment-15829102
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1606:
---
Github user okram commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828937#comment-15828937
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1606:
---
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/539
TINKERPOP-1606: Refactor GroupStep to not have the reduction traversal
included in its BiOperator.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1606
This is huge. With this PR and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP-1606:
-
Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
> Refactor GroupStep to not have the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828624#comment-15828624
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1248:
---
Github user okram commented on the issue:
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/538
Decided to not touch `GroupStep` till the next release as it is more
complicated to handle than `OrderGlobalStep` and `SampleGlobalStep`. Thus, for
this PR:
VOTE +1.
---
If your project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828500#comment-15828500
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1248:
---
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/538
TINKERPOP-1248: OrderGlobalStep should use local star graph to compute
sorts, prior to reduction.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1248
We now support having the projected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1574:
Summary: Get rid of untyped GraphSON in 3.0 (was: Get rid of untyped
GraphSON
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1414:
Description: At 3.3.0 we should probably make GraphSON 3.0 the default
version.
Hello, fellow Apache enthusiast. Thanks for your participation, and
interest in, the projects of the Apache Software Foundation.
I wanted to remind you that the Call For Papers (CFP) for ApacheCon
North America, and Apache: Big Data North America, closes in less than a
month. If you've been
GitHub user dkuppitz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/537
TINKERPOP-1605 gremlin-console 3.2.3 -e can no longer take paths relative
to current working directory
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1605
```
daniel@cube /tmp $
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/536
yes you can just add to that test - all the ssl ones are there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/536
Looks like I can copy GremlinServerIntegrateTest
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1605:
Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
> gremlin-console 3.2.3 -e can no longer take paths
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828115#comment-15828115
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1602:
---
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/536
Is there any reasonable way to write tests for this change?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1602:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: New Feature)
> Support SSL client certificate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828056#comment-15828056
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1566:
---
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/534
Sorry - I'd forgotten you'd mentioned the broken tests. Ok - we'll figure
out what to do there once you rebase. Thanks for renaming the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828050#comment-15828050
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1566:
---
Github user vtslab commented on the issue:
Github user vtslab commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/534
Yes, I mentioned these failing tests in the PR text above. I suspect that
the java security libs just pick up the krb5.conf file from the test resources
"without asking". It means the test fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15828036#comment-15828036
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1600:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/533
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/533
@vtslab i just pushed a fixup commit - i had a sorta dumb mistake on this
pr. i knew that having your work would uncover this - it's good that you had
#534 ready. I merged your changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15827916#comment-15827916
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1601:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/535
So do you suggest a) to remove the assertions that check the metrics for
specific steps or b) to find the indexes of all steps that were present before
strategies were applied?
---
If your
Hello,
> I definitely like this and it would be closer to what we are doing with
> OrientDB distributed architecture. How quick do you think you could create a
> draft of this in TP 3.x?
We already have a working version with the interfaces in gremlin-core/ and an
akka-gremlin/
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/535
This is not the way that this should be done. We shouldn't remove any
strategies. What we should do is generalize the `ProfileTests` so they are not
so specific about step indexes and the like. For
34 matches
Mail list logo