code freeze 3.2.5

Just a reminder that code is frozen on the tp32 branch starting tomorrow (Saturday) and for the following week. We'll use this thread to discuss any issues or problems on 3.2.5 that are found during testing. There are no open pull requests and no outstanding issues that I'm aware of. I've published

Modern Graph

This really surprised me: gremlin> graph = TinkerFactory.createModern() ==>tinkergraph[vertices:6 edges:6] gremlin> g = graph.traversal() ==>graphtraversalsource[tinkergraph[vertices:6 edges:6], standard] gremlin> g.V(1) ==>v[1] gremlin> g.V(1L) gremlin> We all know why it does that - I'm just am

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1489) Provide a Javascript Gremlin Language Variant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16035459#comment-16035459 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1489: --- Github user jbmusso commented o

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #450: TINKERPOP-1489 Javascript GLV

Github user jbmusso commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/450 @jorgebay I'd be happy to help with the work on this. I recently [added partial JavaScript-GLV support to gremlin-javascript](https://github.com/jbmusso/gremlin-javascript/tree/3bdb154f41c08d5adfc

[DISCUSS] IBM Watson "Powered By" on homepage.

Hello, Stephen found this New Stack article which mentions that IBM Watson using Apache TinkerPop. https://twitter.com/apachetinkerpop/status/870650489716613120 I would like to add a link to Watson in our “Powered By” sect

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1552) C# Gremlin Language Variant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034609#comment-16034609 ] Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-1552: - So it seems that we have re

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1552) C# Gremlin Language Variant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034569#comment-16034569 ] stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1552: - I'm fine with Gremlin.Net.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TINKERPOP-1552) C# Gremlin Language Variant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034520#comment-16034520 ] Jorge Bay edited comment on TINKERPOP-1552 at 6/2/17 11:34 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1552) C# Gremlin Language Variant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034520#comment-16034520 ] Jorge Bay commented on TINKERPOP-1552: -- bq. I'm personally in favor of Gremlin.Ne

[DISCUSS] .NET drivers featured on the website

I started working on a new .NET driver for TinkerPop some time ago because I didn't really like the way the existing .NET driver - Teva Gremlin - abstracted away Gremlin from the user. One other important motivation was that a driver was needed that can be used with a GLV. This new driver is called

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1552) C# Gremlin Language Variant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034479#comment-16034479 ] Florian Hockmann commented on TINKERPOP-1552: - {quote} Its worth noting th

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1552) C# Gremlin Language Variant

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034328#comment-16034328 ] Jorge Bay commented on TINKERPOP-1552: -- bq. Jorge Bay are you proposing this stru

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1683) AbstractHadoopGraphComputer on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034308#comment-16034308 ] Felix Hill commented on TINKERPOP-1683: --- The correct RegEx would be \[^;\]*+* in