[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16069218#comment-16069218
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1701:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/643
All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i`
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16068966#comment-16068966
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1474:
-
TINKERPOP-1592 was a dead e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1592.
---
Resolution: Won't Do
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.3.0)
Closing given mailing
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1707:
---
Summary: Remove deprecated AuthenticationSettings.className option
Key: TINKERPOP-1707
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1707
Project:
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1706:
---
Summary: Remove deprecated ScripteEngineCache
Key: TINKERPOP-1706
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1706
Project: TinkerPop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1705:
Labels: breaking (was: )
> Remove deprecated rebindings option
> --
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1705:
---
Summary: Remove deprecated rebindings option
Key: TINKERPOP-1705
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1705
Project: TinkerPop
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16068645#comment-16068645
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1704:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/642
All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i`
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16068488#comment-16068488
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1698:
---
GitHub user spmallette opened a
GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/645
TINKERPOP-1698 Gryo 3.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1698
Gryo 3.0 is in place. A good bunch of the changes just had to do with
adding more tests to cover 3.0 and 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16068399#comment-16068399
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1703:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/641
VOTE +1 - I think providers will generally appreciate being able to extend
the existing steps. Seems easier to allow this now that we have a good feeling
for the stability of the steps themselv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16068260#comment-16068260
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1701:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/643
I'm getting failures with `GryoSerializerIntegrateTest`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
I agree that hiding the stuff providers use to implement graph instances is
a good idea. It then establishes a single way of doing things for users and
reduces a lot of confusion. As long as we have multi-properties (which
cause no end of trouble) the possibility of returning an entire Vertex from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16068188#comment-16068188
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1552:
---
GitHub user spmallette opened a
GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/644
TINKERPOP-1552 Gremlin.Net
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552
Presenting the Gremlin.Net GLV. It follows patterns for GLV generation
established by gremlin-python an
19 matches
Mail list logo