[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1509) Failing test case for tree serialization

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16099042#comment-16099042 ] stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1509: - it's possible that this iss

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1679) Detached side-effects aren't attached when remoted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1679. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.2.6 > Detached side-effects aren't a

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #679: TINKERPOP-1679: Detached side-effects aren't at...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/679 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1679) Detached side-effects aren't attached when remoted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16099029#comment-16099029 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1679: --- Github user asfgit closed the p

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1692) Bump to Neo4j 3.0.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16099025#comment-16099025 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1692: --- Github user spmallette commente

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #680: TINKERPOP-1692 Neo4j 3.2.2

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680 3.3.0 is still SNAPSHOT only. it won't release for another couple of weeks or so i imagine. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitH

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1692) Bump to Neo4j 3.0.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16099008#comment-16099008 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1692: --- Github user jexp commented on t

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1679) Detached side-effects aren't attached when remoted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16099007#comment-16099007 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1679: --- Github user dkuppitz commented

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #679: TINKERPOP-1679: Detached side-effects aren't attached ...

Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/679 VOTE: +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if th

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #680: TINKERPOP-1692 Neo4j 3.2.2

Github user jexp commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680 I didn't see a released 3.3.0 version of tp3 on maven central, that's why I used 3.2.5 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1505) Transaction Status listener list gets overwritten

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098977#comment-16098977 ] Jason Plurad commented on TINKERPOP-1505: - Thanks for the feedback, Stephen. I

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #680: TINKERPOP-1692 Neo4j 3.2.2

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680 ok - well, i'll leave this branch where it is and let you roll with it then. if you want me to just close it, then let me know. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1692) Bump to Neo4j 3.0.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098680#comment-16098680 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1692: --- Github user spmallette commente

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #680: TINKERPOP-1692 Neo4j 3.2.2

Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680 Hmm... so just to reiterate and be super clear the desire is to have Neo4j 3.2.2 on TinkerPop 3.3.0. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appea

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1692) Bump to Neo4j 3.0.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098637#comment-16098637 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1692: --- Github user robertdale commente

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #680: TINKERPOP-1692 Neo4j 3.2.2

Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680 The original request was to upgrade on TinkerPop 3.3 on https://github.com/neo4j-contrib/neo4j-tinkerpop-api-impl/issues/6 . I think with Neo4j and TinkerPop being on similar 3.x.y version sch

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1692) Bump to Neo4j 3.0.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098629#comment-16098629 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1692: --- Github user spmallette commente

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #680: TINKERPOP-1692 Neo4j 3.2.2

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680 confused - does this mean this PR should target 3.2.2? or is there a neo4j-tinkerpop-api-impl 0.6-3.3.0 to use? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1692) Bump to Neo4j 3.0.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098627#comment-16098627 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1692: --- Github user robertdale commente

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #680: TINKERPOP-1692 Neo4j 3.2.2

Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680 @spmallette Sorry I haven't commented earlier. I don't think this is right. This PR is using neo4j-tinkerpop-api-impl 0.6-3.2.2 which uses gremlin 3.2.5. However, master is gremlin 3.3.0-SNAPS

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #674: Neo4j upgrade to 3.2.2 - TINKERPOP-1692

Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/674 I made some quick/minor modifications on #680 - review/votes will occur over there. This PR will be closed. Thanks @jexp for this body of work. --- If your project is set up for it, you can re

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1692) Bump to Neo4j 3.0.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098624#comment-16098624 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1692: --- Github user spmallette commente

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1692) Bump to Neo4j 3.0.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098621#comment-16098621 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1692: --- GitHub user spmallette opened a

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #680: TINKERPOP-1692 Neo4j 3.2.2

GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680 TINKERPOP-1692 Neo4j 3.2.2 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1692 Bumps to Neo4j 3.2.2 and is the revision to #674 which needed some additional `pom.xml` work. That's th

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1729) Remove deprecated select steps.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098461#comment-16098461 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1729: --- Github user okram closed the pu

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1729) Remove deprecated select steps.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098460#comment-16098460 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1729: --- Github user okram commented on

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #677: TINKERPOP-1729: Remove deprecated select steps.

Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/677 Some reason the asfbot was unable to pick up this merge. This was merged -- closing. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #677: TINKERPOP-1729: Remove deprecated select steps.

Github user okram closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/677 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1729) Remove deprecated select steps.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1729. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez Fix Version/s: 3

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #677: TINKERPOP-1729: Remove deprecated select steps.

Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/677 VOTE: +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if th

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1729) Remove deprecated select steps.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098451#comment-16098451 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1729: --- Github user dkuppitz commented

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-1735) java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -2 on Using more than two And Step

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1735. --- Resolution: Invalid This is expected behavior...note that the reference docs for {

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1731) Docker build does not appear to work for gremlin-dotnet

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16098257#comment-16098257 ] stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1731: - I get this: {code} [ERROR]

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1735) java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -2 on Using more than two And Step

Ashraful Islam created TINKERPOP-1735: - Summary: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -2 on Using more than two And Step Key: TINKERPOP-1735 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1735