[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1781.
---
Resolution: Won't Do
Given the last comment and my understanding of things, I thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1647:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Create a Stateful interface for steps that
Here's the issue related to nesting repeat() steps:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-967
it's not clear from the comment where marko left that one exactly. anyway,
i'm not aware of anyone actively working on that.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Moore, Branden James
wrote:
> >
> Out of curiosity, what graph database are you using?
We're using Neo4j as our underlying database, though we have no strong
attachment to it.
Are there roadmap plans to supporting nesting loops? (ie, a repeat under a
repeat)
On 2/15/18, 10:15 AM, "Stephen Mallette" wrote:
Coo
Cool. I flip/flop back and forth about having better support for general
predicates (like text and geo) - seems like this would be a argument in
favor of adding such things to resolve this problem of having to write
server side DSL code. if done right it might save graph providers from
having to wr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365894#comment-16365894
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1788:
-
[~Florian Hockmann] is this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365885#comment-16365885
]
Michael McDermott commented on TINKERPOP-1788:
--
It occurs to me that ther
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1411.
---
Resolution: Won't Do
I think it's hard to generalize here because I don't see any
>Can you talk about what those custom steps do? Do you also have custom
> TraversalStrategies which interact with them?
We do not have any custom TraversalStrategies yet.
We do have custom predicates, though not many... Mostly string operations
(textContains, textRegex).
Most of our cus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365866#comment-16365866
]
Michael McDermott commented on TINKERPOP-1788:
--
Sorry for the slow respon
> Do you expect to *NOT* support server-side DSLs in the future (even as
Bytecode)?
I think that's it's a bit early to say that definitively, but all community
discussion thus far has pointed in the direction of keeping DSLs a
client-side construct, so I'd expect that we would not do much work to
Now that python-gremlin is mature enough to use and extend, I'm working to
migrate our environment to a fully session-less, bytecode-based environment.
However, we currently have significant amounts of "legacy" groovy/gremlin
hanging around. Until all of that can be migrated, we still need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1357.
---
Resolution: Done
Assignee: stephen mallette
Fix Version/s: 3.3.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1357:
Component/s: (was: process)
> Centrality Recipes should mention pageRank and
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1892:
---
Summary: GLV test failures for .NET
Key: TINKERPOP-1892
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1892
Project: TinkerPop
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-620.
--
Resolution: Won't Do
Given that there hasn't been any additional discussion here in s
> Perhaps if there was a way to specify a custom "__" class to the
ImportCustomizer, this would all solve itself?
yes - it might. i don't think we should go down that path though. first of
all, i think the workaround i suggested seems like the way to do this
within the context of what we have rig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365353#comment-16365353
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1857:
---
Github user jorgebay commented
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/798
The increased coverage is great!
I'm still puzzled by ticket 1891 (`P.not()` serialization) but that's a
different issue.
VOTE +1
---
19 matches
Mail list logo