[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16431506#comment-16431506
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1705:
---
GitHub user spmallette opened a
GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/835
TINKERPOP-1705 Removed rebindings API from java driver
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1705
The "rebindings" API methods were long ago deprecated in 3.1.0-incubating
b
GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/834
TINKERPOP-1927 Coerced BulkSet to g:List in GraphSON 3.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1927
Since GLVs don't have `BulkSet` infrastructure and the need to include it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16431033#comment-16431033
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1927:
---
GitHub user spmallette opened a
We're just waiting for Apache Mirrors to sync at this point before we
announce release. I think we can re-open both tp32/tp33 branches for
development again.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> sorry - i did mean the 3.2.8 vote thread (not 3.3.2).
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at
I totally agree. Robert's statement "Any person can choose to run any
preferred tool on a local copy of the source code, ..." nailed it. I do
that from time to time, and it's nice to end up with clean static code
analysis reports, but I don't think it's something we should enforce. When
I commit a
I'm not sure if there's any additional discussion coming on this thread,
but I still feel pretty strongly that (1) "more tools is not better" and
(2) we are basically at a tool selection phase with leanings toward one
with multi-language support (which errorprone is not). I agree with
Robert's asse
sorry - i did mean the 3.2.8 vote thread (not 3.3.2).
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> Just a quick note - we determined in the 3.3.2 vote thread:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a532196a7983e9a66b8949def5a3d4
> 2c40c5155c86f980ea08f0b853@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache
Just a quick note - we determined in the 3.3.2 vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a532196a7983e9a66b8949def5a3d42c40c5155c86f980ea08f0b853@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E
that we'd try to get gremlin-javascript deployed under "gremlin" in npm so
as not to have to re-do the whole rel
