[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16539457#comment-16539457
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1990:
---
Github user twilmes commented on a diff in the
Github user twilmes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/882#discussion_r201547477
--- Diff:
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/computer/search/path/ShortestPathVertexProgram.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,557 @@
xifenghz created TINKERPOP-2003:
---
Summary: After a long period (almost 5days)of parallel
requests(almost 200 request per second),client.submit blocked
Key: TINKERPOP-2003
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1998:
Component/s: test-suite
> IoGraphTest use different schemas for standard and
Hi,
I feel like the project has become a bit too big and dispersed. A large
portion of the emails, jira or otherwise are irrelevant to my
interest/time/work.
Perhaps for version 4, TinkerPop could be broken up into more focused
projects with their own jira/email/process management.
Thanks for starting this conversation, Stephen. Lots of interesting tidbits
here, and perhaps some we can apply to other OSS projects.
> I'm not sure if committers/PMC members have just not had time to do
reviews or have not felt comfortable doing them
Probably a combination of both, especially
Good point, Ted - that wasn't clear and in truth I didn't think that
through well. I think we could say that that the +1 would come from a
committer. If the committer and submitter are one in the same then it has
its single VOTE and technically, the PR just goes through the week long
cooling
Github user mattallenuk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/889#discussion_r201431625
--- Diff:
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/driver-remote-connection.js
---
@@ -151,7 +156,16 @@ class
Github user mattallenuk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/889#discussion_r201429698
--- Diff:
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/remote-connection.js
---
@@ -33,9 +33,11 @@ class RemoteConnection {
I fell way off the PR review train, I'll get back on. For clarification, is
that a +1 on top of the submitter +1? I'm thinking you
all just meant the submitter's +1 would be adequate after the lazy
consensus period but wanted to be sure. I'd be fine to moving with that. My
impression is that with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-2002:
Affects Version/s: 3.2.9
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Wish)
>
> It looks like its disabled for this project.
I don't think we can use the GitHub integration without getting off our
Apache Mirror (which we've discussed, but not really pulled the trigger on
for no particular reason other than the hassle of changing everything).
> Does it have to be in
There might be a better alternative to privately nagging ;-) Github has a
feature on the sidebar that can be used to request reviews from individuals
or groups. The heading has 'Reviewers' and, when it's active, has a gear
icon to select people. Github will then email the reviewers with the
Jeremy Hanna created TINKERPOP-2002:
---
Summary: Create a blog post explaining the value of using TinkerPop
Key: TINKERPOP-2002
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2002
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16538653#comment-16538653
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1913:
-
Linked the TINKERPOP-1906 ticket - there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16538518#comment-16538518
]
Roman Kreisel commented on TINKERPOP-1913:
--
Please note, that solving this ticket would also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16538445#comment-16538445
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1986:
---
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/879
BTW, regardless of the ongoing discussion, my VOTE: +1 :)
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16538433#comment-16538433
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1995:
---
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/888
VOTE +1
---
I'm +1 on the idea of switching to lazy consensus after a single binding
plus one and a week for objection. TinkerPop has so many different modules
/ areas and committers have different expertise that is hard to get 3 votes
on something.
Other projects have the concept of main "reviewer" and this
I've submitted the report for July 2018 to the board.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:42 AM Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> Here is the draft of the January 2018 board report - please let me know if
> there is anything else to add.
>
>
>
I believe that the review process is not working so well anymore. I'm not
sure if committers/PMC members have just not had time to do reviews or have
not felt comfortable doing them, but for the most part they aren't getting
done and PRs are languishing. Personally, I like our process, but if it
Jorge Bay created TINKERPOP-2001:
Summary: JavaScript GLV: Support Groovy and Python lambdas
Key: TINKERPOP-2001
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2001
Project: TinkerPop
Github user jorgebay commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/889#discussion_r201290325
--- Diff:
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/driver-remote-connection.js
---
@@ -151,7 +156,16 @@ class
Github user jorgebay commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/889#discussion_r201295616
--- Diff:
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/driver-remote-connection.js
---
@@ -151,7 +156,16 @@ class
Github user jorgebay commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/889#discussion_r201290758
--- Diff:
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/remote-connection.js
---
@@ -33,9 +33,11 @@ class RemoteConnection {
Github user jorgebay commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/889#discussion_r201296778
--- Diff:
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/driver-remote-connection.js
---
@@ -100,24 +105,24 @@ class
Github user jorgebay commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/889#discussion_r201296096
--- Diff:
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/driver-remote-connection.js
---
@@ -151,7 +156,16 @@ class
Github user jorgebay commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/889#discussion_r201289328
--- Diff:
gremlin-javascript/src/main/javascript/gremlin-javascript/lib/driver/driver-remote-connection.js
---
@@ -151,7 +156,16 @@ class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16538376#comment-16538376
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-2000:
-
It's a custom key, stamped into the
Horacio Hoyos Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-2000:
--
Summary: MANIFEST.MF contains invalid key
Key: TINKERPOP-2000
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2000
Project: TinkerPop
32 matches
Mail list logo
