[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2169) Responses exceeding maxContentLength cause subsequent queries to hang

2019-03-01 Thread Sainath Mallidi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16782263#comment-16782263 ] Sainath Mallidi commented on TINKERPOP-2169: Thanks Stephen for your anal

tp4 branch

2019-03-01 Thread Stephen Mallette
I presume that if you follow the dev list you've followed two interesting threads on the user list: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/yrQDkmDJV-0/uLSBAQrnBgAJ https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gremlin-users/_s_DuKW90gc/Xhp5HMfjAQAJ Given some of the discussion there, Marko asked me how

Re: docker and GLV development

2019-03-01 Thread Florian Hockmann
Wow, for some reason I didn't see your earlier mail and also the linked PR. So, I didn't know that there is already some automation to try out. That made my attempts to help of course a bit pointless :-/ Sorry Stephen if I waisted your time with that. Regarding our initial discussion here: I thin

Re: docker and GLV development

2019-03-01 Thread Robert Dale
I force pushed a fix. Wasn't listening on all nets. Also added a banner for IP address that will appear like so: ... Successfully built b00dc1f2db35 ### IP is 172.17.0.2 ### [INFO] GremlinServer - 3.4.1-SNAPSHOT ... Robert Dale On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:38

Re: docker and GLV development

2019-03-01 Thread Florian Hockmann
I don't know what the problem could be, but two things I can think of that could be helpful to find the problem: * Connect to the container (via docker exec -it [container_id] bash) and then confirm with netstat (which you have to install,  `apk update; apk add ospd-netstat` should work)

Re: docker and GLV development

2019-03-01 Thread Stephen Mallette
i tried adding that -p thing to the run command in the script, but i still couldn't connect to it with Gremlin Console On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:10 PM Florian Hockmann wrote: > Did you start the container with port mapping (e.g., docker run -p > 45940:45940 [image-name]) or how are you trying to

Re: docker and GLV development

2019-03-01 Thread Florian Hockmann
Did you start the container with port mapping (e.g., docker run -p 45940:45940 [image-name]) or how are you trying to connect to the container? Am 01.03.2019 um 19:22 schrieb Stephen Mallette: > The server starts but something seems messed up with the ports. It's like I > can't connect to the 4594

Re: docker and GLV development

2019-03-01 Thread Stephen Mallette
The server starts but something seems messed up with the ports. It's like I can't connect to the 45940 port from the host. I tried a couple things I saw on stackoverflow but nothing i tried seemed to fix it. it's probably something simple...any ideas? On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 10:05 AM Robert Dale w

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2112) Folding in property() step is not being optimally performed

2019-03-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16781828#comment-16781828 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2112: --- spmallette commented on pull r

[GitHub] [tinkerpop] spmallette opened pull request #1076: TINKERPOP-2112 Fold property() so that T values can work in any order

2019-03-01 Thread GitHub
Also optimizes a bit to capture additional possible folds to the "AddElementStep" that would have been otherwise missed before. This should enhance performance of certain mutation traversals depending on the positioning and parameterization of the property() steps as more folding will occur. [

[GitHub] [tinkerpop] spmallette commented on issue #1057: Changed loop break check to break out of the connection creation loop

2019-03-01 Thread GitHub
We have been floating the idea of a release for mid-march - so a couple of weeks or so. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1057 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org

[GitHub] [tinkerpop] tomek22 commented on issue #1057: Changed loop break check to break out of the connection creation loop

2019-03-01 Thread GitHub
I just spent almost a full day figuring out why our service leaks memory and can't open sockets. I tracked it down to this issue. Managed to reproduce locally by killing the gremlin server after the connection pool has already been created and then restarting gremlin server. I was very happy to

Re: docker and GLV development

2019-03-01 Thread Robert Dale
I made a first attempt. Let me know what you think. https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1075 Robert Dale On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:32 AM Stephen Mallette wrote: > > If we agree on Testcontainers in general, then I can give this a try and > use Testcontainers in one of our Java projects

[GitHub] [tinkerpop] robertdale opened pull request #1075: Docker gremlin-server test script

2019-03-01 Thread GitHub
[GremlinDev discussion](https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b3cbdd9083a981681bf6bf0a540dc9ae35d78617dd8d278a53f0995e@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E) [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1075 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.ap

[GitHub] [tinkerpop] joestrouth1 commented on issue #1071: TINKERPOP-2167 Traversals as async iterables in gremlin-javascript

2019-03-01 Thread GitHub
@jorgebay Sure thing, I should be able to get to it this weekend. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1071 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org

[jira] [Work started] (TINKERPOP-2112) Folding in property() step is not being optimally performed

2019-03-01 Thread stephen mallette (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on TINKERPOP-2112 started by stephen mallette. --- > Folding in property() step is not being optimally performed

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-2112) Folding in property() step is not being optimally performed

2019-03-01 Thread stephen mallette (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette reassigned TINKERPOP-2112: --- Assignee: stephen mallette (was: Daniel Kuppitz) Summary: Folding i

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2169) Responses exceeding maxContentLength cause subsequent queries to hang

2019-03-01 Thread stephen mallette (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16781642#comment-16781642 ] stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-2169: - Again, great analysis of t

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-2153) Remove unused parameter from ResponseMessageSerializer

2019-03-01 Thread stephen mallette (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-2153. --- Resolution: Done Assignee: Jorge Bay Fix Version/s: 3.4.1 > Remov

[GitHub] [tinkerpop] harsh9t commented on issue #1074: TINKERPOP-2171 Allow sparql() to be extended with Gremlin steps.

2019-03-01 Thread GitHub
VOTE +1 [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1074 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org

Re: [GitHub] [tinkerpop] spmallette opened pull request #1074: TINKERPOP-2171 Allow sparql() to be extended with Gremlin steps.

2019-03-01 Thread Harsh Thakkar
I vote "+1" for this feature. On 2019/02/28 14:34:01, spmallette (GitHub) wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2171 > > Allows `sparql()` step to be followed by Gremlin steps: > > ```text > gremlin> g.sparql("SELECT * WHERE { }").out("knows").values("name") > ==>vadas > ==>

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-2166) GraphBinary: P deserialization should be optimized

2019-03-01 Thread Jorge Bay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jorge Bay closed TINKERPOP-2166. Resolution: Done > GraphBinary: P deserialization should be optimized > ---

[jira] [Reopened] (TINKERPOP-2166) GraphBinary: P deserialization should be optimized

2019-03-01 Thread Jorge Bay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jorge Bay reopened TINKERPOP-2166: -- > GraphBinary: P deserialization should be optimized >

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-2166) GraphBinary: P deserialization should be optimized

2019-03-01 Thread Jorge Bay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jorge Bay updated TINKERPOP-2166: - Fix Version/s: 3.4.1 > GraphBinary: P deserialization should be optimized > -

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2166) GraphBinary: P deserialization should be optimized

2019-03-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16781495#comment-16781495 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2166: --- jorgebay commented on pull req

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-2166) GraphBinary: P deserialization should be optimized

2019-03-01 Thread Jorge Bay (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jorge Bay closed TINKERPOP-2166. Resolution: Done > GraphBinary: P deserialization should be optimized > ---

[GitHub] [tinkerpop] jorgebay closed pull request #1073: TINKERPOP-2166 Cache expression to obtain the method in PSerializer

2019-03-01 Thread GitHub
[ pull request closed by jorgebay ] [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1073 ] This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org

[GitHub] [tinkerpop] jorgebay commented on issue #1071: TINKERPOP-2167 Traversals as async iterables in gremlin-javascript

2019-03-01 Thread GitHub
@spmallette You are right, it does make sense to deliver it on `3.3.x`... @joestrouth1 Do you mind basing your pull request on `tp33` so this can land on both `3.3` and `3.4`? In case you don't have time to do it, I could cherry pick it. [ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tin