Re: [DISCUSS] connection transport support

That is my recollection as well on DNS-based load balancing. I looked at some other high-profile projects and none seem to really support it specifically and/or in the manner that was done. Thus, use the host list. That seems to be the generally accepted practice. And you are correct in that

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2235) Better handle the concept of null in traversals

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968712#comment-16968712 ] Stephen Mallette commented on TINKERPOP-2235: - Ultimately we did not go with a {{Null}}

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2235) Better handle the concept of null in traversals

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968635#comment-16968635 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2235: --- spmallette commented on pull request #1214:

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-2235) Better handle the concept of null in traversals

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stephen Mallette updated TINKERPOP-2235: Labels: breaking (was: ) > Better handle the concept of null in traversals >

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2312) Empty keys to group() should group to null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968574#comment-16968574 ] Stephen Mallette commented on TINKERPOP-2312: - It just occurred to me that if {{value()}}

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2312) Empty keys to group() should group to null

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968548#comment-16968548 ] Stephen Mallette commented on TINKERPOP-2312: - Kinda wonder about other property getters

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-2312) Empty keys to group() should group to null

Stephen Mallette created TINKERPOP-2312: --- Summary: Empty keys to group() should group to null Key: TINKERPOP-2312 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2312 Project: TinkerPop

Re: [TinkerPop] New Committer: Divij Vaidya

Welcome Divij!! On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 5:30 PM Stephen Mallette wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TinkerPop has asked > Divij Vaidya to become a committer and we are pleased to announce his > acceptance. > > Divij has issued a number of pull requests to TinkerPop around

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1568) Change strategy application order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968377#comment-16968377 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1568: --- spmallette commented on pull request #1211:

[GitHub] [tinkerpop] spmallette commented on issue #1213: Reverts TINKERPOP-2289 resolve ip address

I think revert is a good first step here. Depending upon how the dev list thread goes we can figure out if new JIRA issues are required. Aside from a CHANGELOG entry this looks good to me. @olivertowers if you have a moment to test this branch with CosmosDB to validate that all is good, that

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2289) Use address instead of hostname for connection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16968336#comment-16968336 ] Stephen Mallette commented on TINKERPOP-2289: - Please note that there is discussion on

Re: [DISCUSS] connection transport support

I'm +1 to revert TINKERPOP-2289 as it clearly removed functionality that we once had and that was not intentional. If we need DNS-based load balancing then it needs to work in conjunction with what was there before. Personally, I don't have strong opinion about supporting it or not and if the host