Re: [DISCUSS] consider 3.4.13/3.5.2/3.6.0 release

Do we have an overview anywhere of which branches are frozen at any given time? I have been assuming branches were automatically opened once their releases were done, but I see now that that is not necessarily the case Searching through the mailing list to figure out which branches are frozen can

Re: gremlint dependencies

needs > attention. I tend to think of its utility in that way. > > On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:57 AM Øyvind Sæbø > wrote: > > > I've updated the dependencies as CTR, but it was not straightforward and > > not something npm audit was able to do on its own, which makes me a bit &g

Re: gremlint dependencies

, but I'm not sure it would reduce the manual involvement required. https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/134180f87ef00b08e49dd96ec271e2bb47bd5029 (3.5-dev) https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/ec28bf7f2eaa76e6a5ba71ec7598c5f7db0c56b8 (master) fre. 14. jan. 2022 kl. 13:16 skrev Øyvind

Re: gremlint dependencies

I'll see if I can find time to look into it this weekend. I don't think we need to be concerned about the Gremlint library itself being insecure. It has zero dependencies, so I assume the warnings are related to the tooling we use to build or test the library or website. We should keep those up to

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.5.2 Release

VOTE +1 tir. 11. jan. 2022 kl. 17:14 skrev Jorge Bay Gondra < jorgebaygon...@gmail.com>: > VOTE +1 > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 4:19 PM Kelvin Lawrence > wrote: > > > VOTE +1 > > > > Cheers, Kelvin > > > > > > > On Jan 11, 2022, at 05:39, Stephen Mallette > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.5.1 Release

VOTE +1 > 22. jul. 2021 kl. 20:08 skrev Joshua Shinavier : > > +1 > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:41 AM David Bechberger > wrote: > >> Agreed, thanks for all the hard work. +1 >> >> We should probably include something about Discord in any sort of email >> communication as well. >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] gremlint 3.5.1 release candidate

Very cool! I gave it a quick test and it works! tor. 15. jul. 2021 kl. 16:45 skrev Stephen Mallette : > wow - first try: > > https://www.npmjs.com/package/gremlint > > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 2:28 PM Øyvind Sæbø wrote: > > > > > I

Re: [DISCUSS] gremlint 3.5.1 release candidate

I don’t have a strong opinion on this, so if this is consistent with how it’s been done earlier it sounds good to me. Really excited to see we’re getting close to releasing Gremlint as a library:) Øyvind > 12. jul. 2021 kl. 18:09 skrev Stephen Mallette : > > As we'd discussed elsewhere,

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.5.0 Release

 VOTE +1 tor. 6. mai 2021 kl. 14:51 skrev Jorge Bay Gondra : > Yay! 3.5.0! > > VOTE +1 > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:08 AM wrote: > > > VOTE +1 > > > > One small issue I found while reviewing the upgrade docs though: > > TINKERPOP-2317 removed support for Python lambdas in Gremlin Server, but

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.4.11 Release

VOTE +1 tor. 6. mai 2021 kl. 14:51 skrev Jorge Bay Gondra : > VOTE +1 > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 11:10 AM wrote: > > > I mostly reviewed the docs and all looks good. > > > > VOTE +1 > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Stephen Mallette > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Mai 2021 18:00 >

Re: 3.5.0 Announcement Volunteers

I can write a post about the introduction of Gremlint to TinkerPop and its future possibilities. fre. 30. apr. 2021 kl. 15:55 skrev Marko Rodriguez : > Hello mein freunden, > > I’d love to contribute a body of work from mm-ADT that is one of the main > issues with the Gremlin language: every

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

;> > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/tinkerpop-gremlint.xml > >> > >> I think my last step is to write a post to Incubator to point to the > >> document and to request lazy consensus. I will get that out soon

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

ensus from Apache Incubator on the > submission. At that point we can work on the actual bits of bringing this > in. Almost there! > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 3:55 PM Øyvind Sæbø wrote: > > > Sounds good! > > > > I've always considered the gremlint repo and the gremlint.com re

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

name. > > Well, hopefully this process is getting close to being complete. Excited to > finally see it settling up. > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:14 PM Øyvind Sæbø wrote: > > > Yes, since it's still hosted on my GitHub account, I w

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

someone else at your company? > > I'm still trying to understand from Infra how they would deal with the web > site itself. I'm not sure if they support GitHub pages or if they would > require something else. > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 3:44 AM Øyvind Sæbø wrote: > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

I actually think I misread the guidelines for subitting the CCLA and ICLA, believing hte ICLA had to be submitted together with the CCLA, but it seems I can just submit the ICLA myself, so I have done that today. ons. 10. feb. 2021 kl. 22:29 skrev Øyvind Sæbø : > Hi, Stephen, tha

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

would best transfer? > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:43 AM Stephen Mallette > wrote: > > > Thanks for the update - I'll reacquaint myself with the process and get > > things moving along again on our end now that this step is settled. :) > > > > On Mon, Feb

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

Hi, I'm back again with an update on the ongoing Gremlint IP clearance progress: Today the CCLA was signed by our CEO, so we aim to have my signed ICLA and the CCLA sent to secret...@apache.org as soon as possible. fre. 8. jan. 2021 kl. 09:24 skrev Øyvind Sæbø : > Happy new year! > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

tes - it sounds as though we are getting closer to > having to do more things on this side. Once the I/CCLAs are acknowledged by > Apache I'll go back and revisit the documentation on this process to see > what happens next. > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 9:05 AM Øyvind Sæbø wrote: > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

by the right people at Ardoq. I was hoping to see this done by the end of the week, but seeing as it's only one workday left, I guess we'll just have to wait and see. fre. 27. nov. 2020 kl. 19:24 skrev Øyvind Sæbø : > By >> the way, can gremlint still run completely in browser or d

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

t IP transfer process this week, so I hope we can fill out the ICLA and CCLA next week. I'll add the ASF licence headers to the files early next week as well. ons. 25. nov. 2020 kl. 12:57 skrev Stephen Mallette : > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 3:49 PM Øyvind Sæbø wrote: > > > Yes, I

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

; > I'm just posing questions here for us to discuss a bit. Answers are great > but more questions would also be welcome if anyone has any. > > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:11 AM Øyvind Sæbø wrote: > > > Hello everyone and happy November. > > > > I requested

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

Hello everyone and happy November. I requested another update on when the Gremlint paperwork process would be done yesterday. It seems like it has been pushed back once again, the new estimate being two weeks from now. I figured I should give some context on why this is taking longer than

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

e. Please let us know if there are any questions we might > answer as the process continues at your organization. Thanks. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 11:32 AM Øyvind Sæbø > wrote: > > > It's been a while since I've given an update about where we are in the > > process of

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

week of the month. Thank you all for your patience. tor. 17. sep. 2020 kl. 21:16 skrev Øyvind Sæbø : > I've created a pull request for adding ASF licence headers to all the > files of the project here: https://github.com/OyvindSabo/gremlint/pull/57 > > I'll merge it once the lega

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

s > >> there either. > >> > >> well - that's easy then! > >> > >> a quick side note as we continue this process - the incubator site has > >> regenerated itself so our page is available now: > >> > >> https://i

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting gremlint donation

Yes, I'm following along. Cool to hear that we can move forward with this. I and Ardoq (the company that the project will be donated on behalf of) will start filling out the required ICLA and CCLA .