This v3 looks like a <3 heart where the top broke off.
Sad.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 1:45 PM
To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Subject: Re: io and graphson-v3
never mind - i see what's messed up
On Wed, Sep
..@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 3:38 PM
To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org; Paul A. Jackson <paul.jack...@pb.com>
Subject: Re: Requirements for listing as a vendor
Paul,
We have come up with a format for the Powered By listing.
It can be "Company Product" or just "
Is this a forum for the "Powered By" concept?
Thanks,
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 1:42 PM
To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] ASF Board Draft Report - April 2017
Here's a draft of the board
, projects, nick nacks and doo dads that are out there leveraging
TinkerPizzzop.
Marko.
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 1:56 PM, Paul A. Jackson <paul.jack...@pb.com> wrote:
>
> I agree that the last bullet is not met. We bundle the Tinkerpop stack, so
> the idea of version compatibility
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Paul A. Jackson <paul.jack...@pb.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the requirements for being lists as a Gremlin provider? We
> (Pitney Bowes) have an integrated product offering called Spectrum
> Data Hub (you'll also see it listed as part of the Sp
Hi,
What are the requirements for being lists as a Gremlin provider? We (Pitney
Bowes) have an integrated product offering called Spectrum Data Hub (you'll
also see it listed as part of the Spectrum MDM solution). The product is its
own application server and we embed Gremlin on top of
This code is using the double-checked locking idiom, which does not work in
Java:
Class clazz = getScriptClassFromMap(script);
if (clazz != null) {
return clazz;
}
synchronized (this) {
clazz = getScriptClassFromMap(script);
if (clazz
If you'll forgive "thinking out loud," is there any way to create a wrapper-not
that implements both interfaces and just works?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 2:35 PM
To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Subject:
I'm looking for some insight for when 3.2.4 will release. It looks like voting
closes tomorrow. Is that on schedule, and if so what's a typical ETA for
binaries to be posted?
I don't know if my vote counts, but FTW!
VOTE: +1
Thanks,
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mallette
}
void closeIterator() {
CloseableIterator.closeIterator(this.iterator);
}
}
Thanks,
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Paul A. Jackson [mailto:paul.jack...@pb.com]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 1:55 PM
To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Subject: RE: [GitHub] tinkerpop issue #548: TINKE
loseIterator();// Added
this.iterator = EmptyIterator.instance();
}
void closeIterator() {
CloseableIterator.closeIterator(this.iterator);
}
}
Thanks,
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Paul A. Jackson [mailto:paul.jack...@pb.com]
Sent: Friday
- please put that in the prefix of the PR title so it links back to that
original jira ticket
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Paul A. Jackson <paul.jack...@pb.com>
wrote:
> OK, low-risk PR coming for OLTP part. Should I reuse TINKERPOP-1589?
>
> Thanks,
> -Paul
>
&g
--Original Message-
> From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:58 PM
> To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6
>
> in his case, it should go to tp32.
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at
: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 3:58 PM
To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6
in his case, it should go to tp32.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Paul A. Jackson <paul.jack...@pb.com>
wrote:
> For what branch should a pull request be
that it would make sense to do that.
Basically anywhere that a step interacts with the structure API seems like it
would be a candidate for CloseableIterator to be implemented as it is in
GraphStep.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Paul A. Jackson <paul.jack...@pb.com>
wrote:
> So, I modifie
it also make the same check for CloseableIterator
and call close().
Thoughts?
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Paul A. Jackson [mailto:paul.jack...@pb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 3:01 PM
To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6
Great. I'll try
Is CloseableIterator only in the 3.3 branch?
-Paul
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mallette [mailto:spmalle...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 9:58 AM
To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Release 3.2.4 and 3.1.6
It's been a while since we've had a release (October
I have 2 cents to throw in FWIW.
We use Neo4j and support Gremlin as a query language.
Sometimes it makes sense to preload properties when you load a vertex if you
are in a concurrent environment. Say, you find a vertex via query lookup, if
you read the actual property lazily it's possible for
18 matches
Mail list logo
